We have a “geoserver feature frenzy” presentation coming up at foss4g. Last time we asked the user list what features they found the most valuable (and had some surprises like the number of people who found the oracle database support vital).
This year I would like to cast a wider net - please help out by sharing any “wow I did not know geoserver could do that” experiences!
We have a “geoserver feature frenzy” presentation coming up at foss4g. Last time we asked the user list what features they found the most valuable (and had some surprises like the number of people who found the oracle database support vital).
This year I would like to cast a wider net - please help out by sharing any “wow I did not know geoserver could do that” experiences!
We have a “geoserver feature frenzy” presentation coming up at foss4g. Last time we asked the user list what features they found the most valuable (and had some surprises like the number of people who found the oracle database support vital).
This year I would like to cast a wider net - please help out by sharing any “wow I did not know geoserver could do that” experiences!
We have a “geoserver feature frenzy” presentation coming up at foss4g. Last time we asked the user list what features they found the most valuable (and had some surprises like the number of people who found the oracle database support vital).
This year I would like to cast a wider net - please help out by sharing any “wow I did not know geoserver could do that” experiences!
First, a “wow” moment. At UNAVCO, we are experimenting with a new way to compose GNSS site logs. We have a Geoserver connected to our database and we have successfully mapped most of our site log data into the foriegn GeodesyML schema using the App Schema extension for Geoserver. There are still issues (mostly with datatypes) but it works! We are on our way to being able to distribute entire sitelogs via WFS requests in GeodesyML format!
Second, a request: it would be great to have support for 3D CRSs. PostGIS Point can take up to a 3D (actually it can do 4D too) coordinate and Geoserver could do the same. In particular we use EPSG:4978 (cartesian Earth centered Earth fixed XYZ) along with 4326. I’m not sure how this would work with OpenLayers (Cesium can do 3D maps?) but just recognizing 3D Postgis geometries in features would be a great start!
We have a “geoserver feature frenzy” presentation coming up at foss4g. Last time we asked the user list what features they found the most valuable (and had some surprises like the number of people who found the oracle database support vital).
This year I would like to cast a wider net - please help out by sharing any “wow I did not know geoserver could do that” experiences!
Hi all,
I believe that Jody request got misunderstood, he’s not asking about missing features, he’s asking
about your preferred existing features (or the “wow I did not know GeoServer could do that” ones,
which are still existing ones you weren’t aware of… until you found out :-p )
We have a “geoserver feature frenzy” presentation coming up at foss4g. Last time we asked the user list what features they found the most valuable (and had some surprises like the number of people who found the oracle database support vital).
This year I would like to cast a wider net - please help out by sharing any “wow I did not know geoserver could do that” experiences!
Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy’s New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
We have a “geoserver feature frenzy” presentation coming up at foss4g. Last time we asked the user list what features they found the most valuable (and had some surprises like the number of people who found the oracle database support vital).
This year I would like to cast a wider net - please help out by sharing any “wow I did not know geoserver could do that” experiences!
We have a “geoserver feature frenzy” presentation coming up at foss4g. Last time we asked the user list what features they found the most valuable (and had some surprises like the number of people who found the oracle database support vital).
This year I would like to cast a wider net - please help out by sharing any “wow I did not know geoserver could do that” experiences!