Hi all,
Does anyone know if it´s possible to create groups of feature types in the
WFS configuration? I have 60 layers to publish through the WFS service (not
WMS) and it would be very nice to have them organise in the same way as WMS.
Any ideas on how to work around the problem?
Thanks very much!
Juan Arévalo.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Grouping-featuretypes-in-WFS-tf4887632.html#a13989690
Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
That would be a very nice feature. We currently use geoserver and some
servlets above to join separated WFS.
Best regards,
Milos
Juan Arévalo wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know if it´s possible to create groups of feature types in the
WFS configuration? I have 60 layers to publish through the WFS service
(not WMS) and it would be very nice to have them organise in the same way
as WMS.Any ideas on how to work around the problem?
Thanks very much!
Juan Arévalo.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Grouping-featuretypes-in-WFS-tf4887632.html#a14023755
Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Unfortunately, at least as far as I know, the WFS spec does not have the concept of grouping, like there is in WMS. So we'd break the schemas if we actually grouped.
I suppose we could just order them the same way as WMS, and put xml comments around them? Would that be sufficient? Or are you wanting it to be meaningful to WFS clients? If that's sufficient then feel free to make a feature request.
best regards,
Chris
MastreX wrote:
Hi,
That would be a very nice feature. We currently use geoserver and some
servlets above to join separated WFS.Best regards,
MilosJuan Arévalo wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know if it´s possible to create groups of feature types in the
WFS configuration? I have 60 layers to publish through the WFS service
(not WMS) and it would be very nice to have them organise in the same way
as WMS.Any ideas on how to work around the problem?
Thanks very much!
Juan Arévalo.
MastreX ha scritto:
Hi,
That would be a very nice feature. We currently use geoserver and some
servlets above to join separated WFS.
Join separated WFS? Can you elaborate on this one? 
Cheers
Andrea
Hi,
I was hoping to be meaningful to WFS clients. However, in the meantime I can
follow your advice and write some xml comments.
Thanks,
Juan
Chris Holmes wrote:
Unfortunately, at least as far as I know, the WFS spec does not have the
concept of grouping, like there is in WMS. So we'd break the schemas if
we actually grouped.I suppose we could just order them the same way as WMS, and put xml
comments around them? Would that be sufficient? Or are you wanting it
to be meaningful to WFS clients? If that's sufficient then feel free to
make a feature request.best regards,
Chris
MastreX wrote:
Hi,
That would be a very nice feature. We currently use geoserver and some
servlets above to join separated WFS.Best regards,
MilosJuan Arévalo wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know if it´s possible to create groups of feature types in
the
WFS configuration? I have 60 layers to publish through the WFS service
(not WMS) and it would be very nice to have them organise in the same
way
as WMS.Any ideas on how to work around the problem?
Thanks very much!
Juan Arévalo.
begin:vcard
fn:Chris Holmes
n:Holmes;Chris
org:The Open Planning Project
adr:;;349 W. 12th Street, #3;New York;NY;10014;USA
email;internet:cholmes@anonymised.com
title:Managing Director, Strategic Development
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://topp.openplans.org
version:2.1
end:vcard-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Grouping-featuretypes-in-WFS-tf4887632.html#a14147965
Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
We use "custom" application above geoserver. it´s a servlet where requests
to geoserver are send one by one and response is directly streamed ... it´s
not by ogc but it serve our need. It wolud be a nice feature to have a
response from geoserver where a call can be a list of WFS layers and
response would be data from more than one WFS.
Or better ... complex type response where more than one table from database
can be served.
Example: complete data for list of parcels (list of parcel parts, owners
list, etc...) - where request would be list of parcels and response would be
several datasets.
br, Milos
aaime wrote:
MastreX ha scritto:
Hi,
That would be a very nice feature. We currently use geoserver and some
servlets above to join separated WFS.Join separated WFS? Can you elaborate on this one?
Cheers
Andrea-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Grouping-featuretypes-in-WFS-tf4887632.html#a14177107
Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
MastreX ha scritto:
Hi,
We use "custom" application above geoserver. it´s a servlet where requests
to geoserver are send one by one and response is directly streamed ... it´s
not by ogc but it serve our need. It wolud be a nice feature to have a
response from geoserver where a call can be a list of WFS layers and
response would be data from more than one WFS.Or better ... complex type response where more than one table from database
can be served.Example: complete data for list of parcels (list of parcel parts, owners
list, etc...) - where request would be list of parcels and response would be
several datasets.
Well, with the current GeoServer you can already issue multiple queries
inside the same getfeature request and get back a list of heterogeneous,
disconnected features (each query being independent of the others).
Real complex features and links between them is something we should
be able to have sometimes next year, wfs xlinks relatively soon, one
two months, real complex features later, we don't have plans now
for them (at the moment we are just laying the foundations to be able and support complex features).
Cheers
Andrea
Hi,
Any example or "how-to" for multiple queries?
br, Milos
aaime wrote:
MastreX ha scritto:
Hi,
We use "custom" application above geoserver. it´s a servlet where
requests
to geoserver are send one by one and response is directly streamed ...
it´s
not by ogc but it serve our need. It wolud be a nice feature to have a
response from geoserver where a call can be a list of WFS layers and
response would be data from more than one WFS.Or better ... complex type response where more than one table from
database
can be served.Example: complete data for list of parcels (list of parcel parts, owners
list, etc...) - where request would be list of parcels and response would
be
several datasets.Well, with the current GeoServer you can already issue multiple queries
inside the same getfeature request and get back a list of heterogeneous,
disconnected features (each query being independent of the others).Real complex features and links between them is something we should
be able to have sometimes next year, wfs xlinks relatively soon, one
two months, real complex features later, we don't have plans now
for them (at the moment we are just laying the foundations to be able
and support complex features).Cheers
Andrea-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Grouping-featuretypes-in-WFS-tf4887632.html#a14219224
Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.