[Geoserver-users] GSIP #1 - Project Steering Committee.

Ok, I've put together the first 'GeoServer Improvement Proposal' (GSIP) to bootstrap the Project Steering Committee. Note that I've reworked a decent bit of the http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOSDEV/0+Project+Steering+Committee Please be sure to read it closely and raise any issues on the list. The initial text was missing a bit, hopefully I've filled in more. We can discuss the proposal and change the text until we are happy with it. Other new pages to note: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOSDEV/How+to+make+a+GeoServer+Improvement+Proposal
and
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/GeoServer+Improvement+Proposals

This proposal can be found at: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+1+-+Project+Steering+Committee+formation

text is as follows:

Overview

The bootstrapping of the Project Steering Committee, to give it power in a formal motion

Proposed By:
Chris Holmes
Proposal Type:
Process
Assigned to release:
N/A
State:
being discussed
Voting history:
(votes recorded here)
Links

Email discussion:
http://www.nabble.com/PSC-Nominations-tf1674552.html#a4539674
http://www.nabble.com/Project-Steering-Commitee-Page-tf1817423.html#a4954477
http://www.nabble.com/PSC-member-votes-tf1956646.html#a5366764
http://www.nabble.com/PSC-votes-are-in!-tf1986457.html#a5451688

Other wiki discussions:
GEOSDEV:0 Project Steering Committee history
Motivations

The GeoServer community has gotten strong enough that a benevolent dictator model no longer makes sense. Power should also be distributed to all who have contributed extensively, so that no one organization controls the direction of the project. The community has done a decent job of bootstrapping itself, and it's always been TOPP's intention to move to a PSC model when appropriate.

The formation of the PSC should hopefully make GeoServer an even more open project, and ideally even attract further outside contributors, who can feel confident that we are a merit based project - that extensive contributions are rewarded with full say in the future direction of the GeoServer Project.
Proposal

The Project Steering Committe shall be initially formed with the following members:

     * Alessio Fabiani
     * Andrea Aime
     * Chris Holmes
     * Gabriel Roldan
     * Jody Garnett
     * Justin Deoliveira
     * Rob Atkinson

Chris Holmes will serve as the initial chair. These were gathered by a voting procedure to bootstrap the initial group. Future decisions will be made by the PSC. PSC procedures are outlines in 'Implementation'
Implementation

The current procedures of the PSC will always be located at the PSC page. It details the structure, responsibilities, and procedures of the PSC. This is a living document, and by following the procedures laid out within it the PSC can change the guidelines. Small tweaks can also be made without formal proposals.
Participants

     * Alessio Fabiani
     * Andrea Aime
     * Chris Holmes
     * Gabriel Roldan
     * Jody Garnett
     * Justin Deoliveira
     * Rob Atkinson

--
Chris Holmes
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org

Looks great Chris.

I took the liberty of testing them out to come up with GSIP#2.

http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+2+-+Automated+Code+Formatting

-Justin

Chris Holmes wrote:

Ok, I've put together the first 'GeoServer Improvement Proposal' (GSIP) to bootstrap the Project Steering Committee. Note that I've reworked a decent bit of the http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOSDEV/0+Project+Steering+Committee Please be sure to read it closely and raise any issues on the list. The initial text was missing a bit, hopefully I've filled in more. We can discuss the proposal and change the text until we are happy with it. Other new pages to note: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOSDEV/How+to+make+a+GeoServer+Improvement+Proposal

and
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/GeoServer+Improvement+Proposals

This proposal can be found at: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+1+-+Project+Steering+Committee+formation

text is as follows:

Overview

The bootstrapping of the Project Steering Committee, to give it power in a formal motion

Proposed By:
Chris Holmes
Proposal Type:
Process
Assigned to release:
N/A
State:
being discussed
Voting history:
(votes recorded here)
Links

Email discussion:
http://www.nabble.com/PSC-Nominations-tf1674552.html#a4539674
http://www.nabble.com/Project-Steering-Commitee-Page-tf1817423.html#a4954477

http://www.nabble.com/PSC-member-votes-tf1956646.html#a5366764
http://www.nabble.com/PSC-votes-are-in!-tf1986457.html#a5451688

Other wiki discussions:
GEOSDEV:0 Project Steering Committee history
Motivations

The GeoServer community has gotten strong enough that a benevolent dictator model no longer makes sense. Power should also be distributed to all who have contributed extensively, so that no one organization controls the direction of the project. The community has done a decent job of bootstrapping itself, and it's always been TOPP's intention to move to a PSC model when appropriate.

The formation of the PSC should hopefully make GeoServer an even more open project, and ideally even attract further outside contributors, who can feel confident that we are a merit based project - that extensive contributions are rewarded with full say in the future direction of the GeoServer Project.
Proposal

The Project Steering Committe shall be initially formed with the following members:

    * Alessio Fabiani
    * Andrea Aime
    * Chris Holmes
    * Gabriel Roldan
    * Jody Garnett
    * Justin Deoliveira
    * Rob Atkinson

Chris Holmes will serve as the initial chair. These were gathered by a voting procedure to bootstrap the initial group. Future decisions will be made by the PSC. PSC procedures are outlines in 'Implementation'
Implementation

The current procedures of the PSC will always be located at the PSC page. It details the structure, responsibilities, and procedures of the PSC. This is a living document, and by following the procedures laid out within it the PSC can change the guidelines. Small tweaks can also be made without formal proposals.
Participants

    * Alessio Fabiani
    * Andrea Aime
    * Chris Holmes
    * Gabriel Roldan
    * Jody Garnett
    * Justin Deoliveira
    * Rob Atkinson

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

!DSPAM:1004,44cec5a9126061804284693!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

!DSPAM:1004,44cec5a9126061804284693!

--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
jdeolive@anonymised.com

Never got around to +1'ing GSIP #1.

Justin Deoliveira wrote:

Looks great Chris.

I took the liberty of testing them out to come up with GSIP#2.

http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+2+-+Automated+Code+Formatting

-Justin

Chris Holmes wrote:

Ok, I've put together the first 'GeoServer Improvement Proposal' (GSIP)
to bootstrap the Project Steering Committee. Note that I've reworked a
decent bit of the
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOSDEV/0+Project+Steering+Committee
Please be sure to read it closely and raise any issues on the list. The
initial text was missing a bit, hopefully I've filled in more. We can
discuss the proposal and change the text until we are happy with it.
Other new pages to note:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOSDEV/How+to+make+a+GeoServer+Improvement+Proposal

and
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/GeoServer+Improvement+Proposals

This proposal can be found at:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+1+-+Project+Steering+Committee+formation

text is as follows:

Overview

The bootstrapping of the Project Steering Committee, to give it power in
a formal motion

Proposed By:
Chris Holmes
Proposal Type:
Process
Assigned to release:
N/A
State:
being discussed
Voting history:
(votes recorded here)
Links

Email discussion:
http://www.nabble.com/PSC-Nominations-tf1674552.html#a4539674
http://www.nabble.com/PSC-Nominations-tf1674552.html#a4539674
http://www.nabble.com/Project-Steering-Commitee-Page-tf1817423.html#a4954477

http://www.nabble.com/PSC-member-votes-tf1956646.html#a5366764
http://www.nabble.com/PSC-votes-are-in!-tf1986457.html#a5451688

Other wiki discussions:
GEOSDEV:0 Project Steering Committee history
Motivations

The GeoServer community has gotten strong enough that a benevolent
dictator model no longer makes sense. Power should also be distributed
to all who have contributed extensively, so that no one organization
controls the direction of the project. The community has done a decent
job of bootstrapping itself, and it's always been TOPP's intention to
move to a PSC model when appropriate.

The formation of the PSC should hopefully make GeoServer an even more
open project, and ideally even attract further outside contributors, who
can feel confident that we are a merit based project - that extensive
contributions are rewarded with full say in the future direction of the
GeoServer Project.
Proposal

The Project Steering Committe shall be initially formed with the
following members:

    * Alessio Fabiani
    * Andrea Aime
    * Chris Holmes
    * Gabriel Roldan
    * Jody Garnett
    * Justin Deoliveira
    * Rob Atkinson

Chris Holmes will serve as the initial chair. These were gathered by a
voting procedure to bootstrap the initial group. Future decisions will
be made by the PSC. PSC procedures are outlines in 'Implementation'
Implementation

The current procedures of the PSC will always be located at the PSC
page. It details the structure, responsibilities, and procedures of the
PSC. This is a living document, and by following the procedures laid out
within it the PSC can change the guidelines. Small tweaks can also be
made without formal proposals.
Participants

    * Alessio Fabiani
    * Andrea Aime
    * Chris Holmes
    * Gabriel Roldan
    * Jody Garnett
    * Justin Deoliveira
    * Rob Atkinson

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

!DSPAM:1004,44cec5a9126061804284693!

--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
jdeolive@anonymised.com

Thanks Justin. I was waiting for 100% approval on this one, normally we don't have to, but this one feels like it should have it.

So we've got a PSC! We should probably announce this somewhere. And now we can move on to bigger and better proposals.

Thanks everyone.

Chris

Justin Deoliveira wrote:

Never got around to +1'ing GSIP #1.

Justin Deoliveira wrote:

Looks great Chris.

I took the liberty of testing them out to come up with GSIP#2.

http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+2+-+Automated+Code+Formatting

-Justin

Chris Holmes wrote:

Ok, I've put together the first 'GeoServer Improvement Proposal' (GSIP) to bootstrap the Project Steering Committee. Note that I've reworked a decent bit of the http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOSDEV/0+Project+Steering+Committee Please be sure to read it closely and raise any issues on the list. The initial text was missing a bit, hopefully I've filled in more. We can discuss the proposal and change the text until we are happy with it. Other new pages to note: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOSDEV/How+to+make+a+GeoServer+Improvement+Proposal

and
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/GeoServer+Improvement+Proposals

This proposal can be found at: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+1+-+Project+Steering+Committee+formation

text is as follows:

Overview

The bootstrapping of the Project Steering Committee, to give it power in a formal motion

Proposed By:
Chris Holmes
Proposal Type:
Process
Assigned to release:
N/A
State:
being discussed
Voting history:
(votes recorded here)
Links

Email discussion:
http://www.nabble.com/PSC-Nominations-tf1674552.html#a4539674
http://www.nabble.com/Project-Steering-Commitee-Page-tf1817423.html#a4954477

http://www.nabble.com/PSC-member-votes-tf1956646.html#a5366764
http://www.nabble.com/PSC-votes-are-in!-tf1986457.html#a5451688

Other wiki discussions:
GEOSDEV:0 Project Steering Committee history
Motivations

The GeoServer community has gotten strong enough that a benevolent dictator model no longer makes sense. Power should also be distributed to all who have contributed extensively, so that no one organization controls the direction of the project. The community has done a decent job of bootstrapping itself, and it's always been TOPP's intention to move to a PSC model when appropriate.

The formation of the PSC should hopefully make GeoServer an even more open project, and ideally even attract further outside contributors, who can feel confident that we are a merit based project - that extensive contributions are rewarded with full say in the future direction of the GeoServer Project.
Proposal

The Project Steering Committe shall be initially formed with the following members:

    * Alessio Fabiani
    * Andrea Aime
    * Chris Holmes
    * Gabriel Roldan
    * Jody Garnett
    * Justin Deoliveira
    * Rob Atkinson

Chris Holmes will serve as the initial chair. These were gathered by a voting procedure to bootstrap the initial group. Future decisions will be made by the PSC. PSC procedures are outlines in 'Implementation'
Implementation

The current procedures of the PSC will always be located at the PSC page. It details the structure, responsibilities, and procedures of the PSC. This is a living document, and by following the procedures laid out within it the PSC can change the guidelines. Small tweaks can also be made without formal proposals.
Participants

    * Alessio Fabiani
    * Andrea Aime
    * Chris Holmes
    * Gabriel Roldan
    * Jody Garnett
    * Justin Deoliveira
    * Rob Atkinson

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

--
Chris Holmes
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org

Chris Holmes wrote:

Thanks Justin. I was waiting for 100% approval on this one, normally we don't have to, but this one feels like it should have it.

So we've got a PSC! We should probably announce this somewhere. And now we can move on to bigger and better proposals.

Nice thank for all the hard working getting this going everyone.
Jody

We should change the state of proposal to Approved then :slight_smile:

On 8/11/06, Jody Garnett <jgarnett@anonymised.com > wrote:

Chris Holmes wrote:

Thanks Justin. I was waiting for 100% approval on this one, normally
we don’t have to, but this one feels like it should have it.

So we’ve got a PSC! We should probably announce this somewhere. And
now we can move on to bigger and better proposals.
Nice thank for all the hard working getting this going everyone.
Jody


Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642


Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Eng. Alessio Fabiani
Vice President/CTO GeoSolutions

http://www.geo-solutions.it


Alessio Fabiani wrote:

We should change the state of proposal to Approved then :slight_smile:

And record all the votes, thought Chris may of done that ... fixing now.
Going to mark it as active for now, and give it a jira number in any case, Chris can close it and mark it complete when he gets around to it.

Cheers,
Jody

Jody Garnett wrote:

Alessio Fabiani wrote:

We should change the state of proposal to Approved then :slight_smile:

And record all the votes, thought Chris may of done that ... fixing now.
Going to mark it as active for now, and give it a jira number in any case, Chris can close it and mark it complete when he gets around to it.

Done. Though there's no requirement for a jira task for all GSIPs, and it feels a bit redundant here. I agree most issue will have a jira, but this isn't affecting the code base in the slightest, and it seems like extra overhead.

Cheers,
Jody

!DSPAM:1003,44dc56a8266381460912952!

--
Chris Holmes
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org