My questions relate to Serving huge raster datasets with GeoServer, but as I’m using a different configuration, I’ll start a new thread.
I was planning to use GeoServer, GeoWebCache and OpenLayers to serve ESRI data as WMS, WFS and WCS services to our web clients. Not too many problems for vector data, but well for raster data.
The data being read and modified by other (ESRI) applications, and as it’s huge (2TB uncompressed) they have to reside on an ESRI-compatible storage, not in GeoServer (other than cache).
Currently the raster data is stored in three FGDB’s :
- Non colormapped 3 bands RGB, 680 GB uncompressed, has to grow to 1.3 TB, pyramid level 10, jpeg compressed
- Non colormapped 1 band B&W, 230 GB uncompressed, pyramid level 10, jpeg compressed
- Colormapped 1 band unsigned byte, three tables of 140 GB in total, pyramids level 10, 8 and 7, LZ77 compressed.
As ESRI has been working since 2006 on an open API for FGDB, I don’t expect it for tomorrow. So we’d have to change our storage anyway.
The vector data being on an arcsde-oracle server, I thought I could maybe put the raster data as well in this DB and serve them from there. But serving arcsde colormapped rasters is planned for GeoServer 1.7.3 release, and I’m not sure yet if this is a good solution for serving huge data.
My questions :
- Any solution for working directly with the FGDB files ?
- Could arcsde be a good solution, when it will get developped ?
- Is it really planned for version 1.7.3, or could it be moved to a later release ?
- Should I go the GDAL way ? or another one ?
I really hope I can use GeoServer to serve my data, but if it wouldn’t fit my needs, would another project do it ? MapServer, MapFish ?
Alain
View this message in context: Huge raster dataset - FGDB & ArcSDE
Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.