Hi,
I try to use KML produced by Geoserver (1.6.4) in OpenLayers (2.6) but the
XML generated is not accepted (silently alas). I checked the file and I
eventually found 2 'mistakes' in the KML. Here's 2 fragments where the
first (corrected) works while the second (directly from Geoserver) fails :
<kml xmlns="http://earth.google.com/kml/2.2">
<Document>
<name>edfgeo:clientassoc</name>
<Style id="GeoServerStyleclientassoc.nfm--730056c2_11c0891a30b_-21f4">
<IconStyle>
<color>ff33ffff</color>
<colorMode>normal</colorMode>
<Icon>
<href>http://maps.google.com/mapfiles/kml/pal4/icon25.png</href>
</Icon>
</IconStyle>
...
and
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<kml >
<Document>
<name>edfgeo:clientassoc</name>
<Style id="GeoServerStyleclientassoc.nfm--730056c2_11c0891a30b_-21f4">
<IconStyle>
<Icon/>
</IconStyle>
<IconStyle>
<color>ff33ffff</color>
<colorMode>normal</colorMode>
<Icon>
<href>http://maps.google.com/mapfiles/kml/pal4/icon25.png</href>
</Icon>
</IconStyle>
...
In the second fragment the default namespace is missing and a 'void'
IconStyle appears.
Has anybody got this problem before ?
Cheers
Laurent
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/KML-from-Geoserver-to-Openlayers-tp19199815p19199815.html
Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
That does sound like a bug, could you report it? And include the data you're using if possible.
Could you try one thing though? It looks like GeoServer wasn't able to find a good id to use, so it's just automatically creating a pretty bad one. If you're using a database could you define a primary key for the table you're using? And let me know if that helps the problem at all. Even if it does fix it this is still a bug, we should be able to handle it, but I want to figure out if the problem is general or just specific to datasets without good ids.
best regards,
Chris
LaurentPierre wrote:
Hi,
I try to use KML produced by Geoserver (1.6.4) in OpenLayers (2.6) but the
XML generated is not accepted (silently alas). I checked the file and I
eventually found 2 'mistakes' in the KML. Here's 2 fragments where the
first (corrected) works while the second (directly from Geoserver) fails :
<kml xmlns="http://earth.google.com/kml/2.2">
<Document>
<name>edfgeo:clientassoc</name>
<Style id="GeoServerStyleclientassoc.nfm--730056c2_11c0891a30b_-21f4">
<IconStyle>
<color>ff33ffff</color>
<colorMode>normal</colorMode>
<Icon>
<href>http://maps.google.com/mapfiles/kml/pal4/icon25.png</href>
</Icon>
</IconStyle>
...
and
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<kml >
<Document>
<name>edfgeo:clientassoc</name>
<Style id="GeoServerStyleclientassoc.nfm--730056c2_11c0891a30b_-21f4">
<IconStyle>
<Icon/>
</IconStyle>
<IconStyle>
<color>ff33ffff</color>
<colorMode>normal</colorMode>
<Icon>
<href>http://maps.google.com/mapfiles/kml/pal4/icon25.png</href>
</Icon>
</IconStyle>
...
In the second fragment the default namespace is missing and a 'void'
IconStyle appears.
Has anybody got this problem before ?
Cheers
Laurent
Hi Chris
Chris Holmes-4 wrote:
That does sound like a bug, could you report it? And include the data
you're using if possible.
I do it asap
Chris Holmes-4 wrote:
Could you try one thing though? It looks like GeoServer wasn't able to
find a good id to use, so it's just automatically creating a pretty bad
one. If you're using a database could you define a primary key for the
table you're using? And let me know if that helps the problem at all.
Even if it does fix it this is still a bug, we should be able to handle
it, but I want to figure out if the problem is general or just specific
to datasets without good ids.
I defined a pk on my table and if the generated id's are nicer the 2
problems in the KML remained the same 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<kml>
<Document>
<name>edfgeo:clientassoc</name>
<Style id="GeoServerStyleclientassoc.647">
<IconStyle>
<Icon/>
</IconStyle>
<IconStyle>
<color>ffa34e98</color>
<colorMode>normal</colorMode>
<Icon>
<href>http://maps.google.com/mapfiles/kml/pal4/icon25.png</href>
</Icon>
</IconStyle>
<IconStyle>
<colorMode>normal</colorMode>
<Icon>
<href>http://maps.google.com/mapfiles/kml/pal4/icon25.png</href>
</Icon>
</IconStyle>
</Style>
<Placemark id="clientassoc.647">
<description><
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<kml>
<Document>
<name>edfgeo:clientassoc</name>
<Style id="GeoServerStyleclientassoc.647">
<IconStyle>
<Icon/>
</IconStyle>
<IconStyle>
<color>ffa34e98</color>
<colorMode>normal</colorMode>
<Icon>
<href>http://maps.google.com/mapfiles/kml/pal4/icon25.png</href>
</Icon>
</IconStyle>
<IconStyle>
<colorMode>normal</colorMode>
<Icon>
<href>http://maps.google.com/mapfiles/kml/pal4/icon25.png</href>
</Icon>
</IconStyle>
</Style>
<Placemark id="clientassoc.647">
<description><![CDATA[<table border='1'>
Cheers
Laurent
Chris Holmes-4 wrote:
Darn. If you could include the sld you're using too that could be good.
Though we should be including the namespace. And should also detect
if a style is going to be empty and not use it in that case.
I changed from my style to a standard one in geoserver (poi) and it didn't
change anything
Chris Holmes-4 wrote:
Also, in case you haven't found it,
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOSDOC/1+Reporting+Issues has instructions
on reporting things.
I'll do it this we
Chris Holmes-4 wrote:
We also might consider reporting it on OpenLayers too, it would be good
if they were more flexible on the KML they read, as there's a lot of bad
KML out there that Google handles fine. Things like extra empty xml
elements and lack of namespace I feel like it should be able to handle.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
I reported to OpenLayers but I had no answers yet. But you're right they
should be more flexible : I'll tell them in the next post.
Cheers and thank you for your help
Laurent
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/KML-from-Geoserver-to-Openlayers-tp19199815p19204286.html
Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.