[Geoserver-users] (no subject)

GeoServer GeoServer User
1

Hi,

I have some problems with Geoserver CQL filter that I can’t solve now for a week of reading and trying everything out.

Geoserver is 2.5.2 and I am trying to use BBOX CQL filter, but get a strange result like this:

loadFeatures({"type":"FeatureCollection","totalFeatures":15640,"features":[]})

It showing a total 15640 features in that bbox, but why there are no list of them and “features” are just empty list?

This is my CQL filter:

[http://loom-gis.geo.ut.ee:8080/geoserver/ermas/ows?service=WFS&version=1.1.0&request=GetFeature&typeName=ermas:testdata_geopnt&outputFormat=text/javascript&format_options=callback:loadFeatures&maxFeatures=50&srsname=EPSG:3301&EPSG:3301&CQL_FILTER=%28BBOX%28geometry,494981.10875,%206437855.3625,%20684824.8587499999,%206569105.3625%29%29](http://loom-gis.geo.ut.ee:8080/geoserver/ermas/ows?service=WFS&version=1.1.0&request=GetFeature&typeName=ermas:testdata_geopnt&outputFormat=text/javascript&format_options=callback:loadFeatures&maxFeatures=50&srsname=EPSG:3301&EPSG:3301&CQL_FILTER=%28BBOX%28geometry,494981.10875,%206437855.3625,%20684824.8587499999,%206569105.3625%29%29)

Any suggestions?


Thanks in advance.

2

Hi Olga,

Did you already checked the log ?

Are you observing the same behaviour with different output formats?

Cheers,

Stefano

···

2014-11-05 15:44 GMT+01:00 Olga Troškina <olga.troskina@anonymised.com>:

Hi,

I have some problems with Geoserver CQL filter that I can’t solve now for a week of reading and trying everything out.

Geoserver is 2.5.2 and I am trying to use BBOX CQL filter, but get a strange result like this:

loadFeatures({"type":"FeatureCollection","totalFeatures":15640,"features":[]})

It showing a total 15640 features in that bbox, but why there are no list of them and “features” are just empty list?

This is my CQL filter:

[http://loom-gis.geo.ut.ee:8080/geoserver/ermas/ows?service=WFS&version=1.1.0&request=GetFeature&typeName=ermas:testdata_geopnt&outputFormat=text/javascript&format_options=callback:loadFeatures&maxFeatures=50&srsname=EPSG:3301&EPSG:3301&CQL_FILTER=%28BBOX%28geometry,494981.10875,%206437855.3625,%20684824.8587499999,%206569105.3625%29%29](http://loom-gis.geo.ut.ee:8080/geoserver/ermas/ows?service=WFS&version=1.1.0&request=GetFeature&typeName=ermas:testdata_geopnt&outputFormat=text/javascript&format_options=callback:loadFeatures&maxFeatures=50&srsname=EPSG:3301&EPSG:3301&CQL_FILTER=%28BBOX%28geometry,494981.10875,%206437855.3625,%20684824.8587499999,%206569105.3625%29%29)

Any suggestions?


Thanks in advance.

Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@anonymised.comsts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

41.95581N 12.52854E

http://www.linkedin.com/in/stefanoiacovella

http://twitter.com/#!/Iacovellas

3

Hi!

Just now I tried with different formats and I am now so confused. Havent trried this before, but it works with other formats and with GeoJSOn also, but my link does not.

http://loom-gis.geo.ut.ee:8080/geoserver/ermas/ows?service=WFS&version=1.0.0&request=GetFeature&format_options=callback:loadFeatures&srsname=EPSG:3301&EPSG:3301&typeName=ermas:testdata_geopnt&outputFormat=text/javascript&maxFeatures=50&CQL_FILTER=%28BBOX%28geometry,494981.10875,%206437855.3625,%20684824.8587499999,%206569105.3625%29%29

http://loom-gis.geo.ut.ee:8080/geoserver/ermas/ows?service=WFS&version=1.1.0&request=GetFeature&format_options=callback:loadFeatures&srsname=EPSG:3301&EPSG:3301&typeName=ermas:testdata_geopnt&outputFormat=text/javascript&maxFeatures=30&CQL_FILTER=%28BBOX%28geometry,494981.10875,%206437855.3625,%20684824.8587499999,%206569105.3625%29%29

And now I see that there are different WFS versions. So is this correct that with 1.1.0 it doesn’t work?

···

2014-11-05 17:16 GMT+02:00 Stefano Iacovella <stefano.iacovella@anonymised.com>:

Hi Olga,

Did you already checked the log ?

Are you observing the same behaviour with different output formats?

Cheers,

Stefano

41.95581N 12.52854E

http://www.linkedin.com/in/stefanoiacovella

http://twitter.com/#!/Iacovellas

2014-11-05 15:44 GMT+01:00 Olga Troškina <olga.troskina@anonymised.com>:

Hi,

I have some problems with Geoserver CQL filter that I can’t solve now for a week of reading and trying everything out.

Geoserver is 2.5.2 and I am trying to use BBOX CQL filter, but get a strange result like this:

loadFeatures({"type":"FeatureCollection","totalFeatures":15640,"features":[]})

It showing a total 15640 features in that bbox, but why there are no list of them and “features” are just empty list?

This is my CQL filter:

[http://loom-gis.geo.ut.ee:8080/geoserver/ermas/ows?service=WFS&version=1.1.0&request=GetFeature&typeName=ermas:testdata_geopnt&outputFormat=text/javascript&format_options=callback:loadFeatures&maxFeatures=50&srsname=EPSG:3301&EPSG:3301&CQL_FILTER=%28BBOX%28geometry,494981.10875,%206437855.3625,%20684824.8587499999,%206569105.3625%29%29](http://loom-gis.geo.ut.ee:8080/geoserver/ermas/ows?service=WFS&version=1.1.0&request=GetFeature&typeName=ermas:testdata_geopnt&outputFormat=text/javascript&format_options=callback:loadFeatures&maxFeatures=50&srsname=EPSG:3301&EPSG:3301&CQL_FILTER=%28BBOX%28geometry,494981.10875,%206437855.3625,%20684824.8587499999,%206569105.3625%29%29)

Any suggestions?


Thanks in advance.

Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

4

2014-11-05 16:59 GMT+01:00 Olga Troškina <olga.troskina@anonymised.com>:

And now I see that there are different WFS versions. So is this correct
that with 1.1.0 it doesn't work?

Not sure about it, may be Andrea, or someone else form the developers team,
can comment on this.
Can you go with version 1.0.0?

---------------------------------------------------
41.95581N 12.52854E

http://www.linkedin.com/in/stefanoiacovella

http://twitter.com/#!/Iacovellas

5

Fortunately yes, I can work with 1.0.0 too. Thanks for suggesting to control different output formats.

···

2014-11-05 18:28 GMT+02:00 Stefano Iacovella <stefano.iacovella@anonymised.com>:

2014-11-05 16:59 GMT+01:00 Olga Troškina <olga.troskina@anonymised.com>:

And now I see that there are different WFS versions. So is this correct that with 1.1.0 it doesn’t work?

Not sure about it, may be Andrea, or someone else form the developers team, can comment on this.

Can you go with version 1.0.0?

41.95581N 12.52854E

http://www.linkedin.com/in/stefanoiacovella

http://twitter.com/#!/Iacovellas