Hi
My performance tests show that WMS requests in version 1.3 has been slower
in Geoserver 2.5.1
In Geoserver log i can see that PostGIS Select has different coordinates for
POLYGON in version 1.3 compared to 1.1.1.
any idea ?
From Geoserver log version 1.3
SELECT "OBJECTID","KKOD",encode(ST_AsBinary(ST_Force_2D("geom")),'base64')
as "geom" FROM "mm"."VL_TRK" WHERE ("geom" && ST_GeomFromText('POLYGON
((667000 6573000, 667000 6584906, 678906 6584906, 678906 6573000, 667000
6573000))', 3006) ........
From Geoserver log version 1.1.1
SELECT "OBJECTID","KKOD",encode(ST_AsBinary(ST_Force_2D("geom")),'base64')
as "geom" FROM "lm"."VL_TRK" WHERE ("geom" && ST_GeomFromText('POLYGON
((666964.282 6572964.282, 666964.282 6584941.718, 678941.718 6584941.718,
678941.718 6572964.282, 666964.282 6572964.282))', 3006) .........
Thanks
Per
--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Performance-with-Geoserver-2-5-1-and-WMS-1-3-tp5146051.html
Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:22 PM, perre <per.reinholdt@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi
My performance tests show that WMS requests in version 1.3 has been slower
in Geoserver 2.5.1
Compared to what? Previous versions, 1.1.1 in the same version?
Anyways, no, nothing comes to mind.
Cheers
Andrea
--
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
Hi
Performance is slower with version 1.3.0 and Geoserver 2.5.1.
With Geoserver 2.5.0, the performance was better with version 1.3.0.
Version 1.1.1 has good performance in both releases.
The requests is identical in all cases in my JMeter test.
/Per
--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Performance-with-Geoserver-2-5-1-and-WMS-1-3-tp5146051p5146279.html
Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:54 PM, perre <per.reinholdt@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi
The result of the tests:
1000 ms with version 1.3.0 and Geoserver 2.5.0
1800 ms with version 1.3.0 and Geoserver 2.5.1
The WMS request in version 1.3.0
http://localhost:8080/geoserver/wms?&SERVICE=WMS&LAYERS=FastighetPlus&EXEPTIONS=application/vnd.ogc.se_xml&FORMAT=image/png&HEIGHT=1000&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&REQUEST=GetMap&BBOX=6573000,667000,6584906,678906&WIDTH=1000&STYLES=&SRS=EPSG:3006&VERSION=1.3.0
Ok, then I guess we have a regression somewhere
Please open a ticket on jira, sharing data and style (enough to reproduce
locally)
Cheers
Andrea
--
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------