I tested 1.70 beta 1 and found some problems when using 8-bit GeoTiffs'. Not that this would concern only those rasters but I only have them in my test site. It seems that they would open into the view but nothing can be seen. Still I get features out of them by clicking the empty screen.
You can test them by opening:
http://karjala.digikartta.net/kartat/mapPreview.do
All but the first with dikanet namespace include images. They all worked with the previous version.
- mika -
Ciao Mika,
a few questions:
- do you actually see any error messages in the geoserver log?
- can you provide a sample dataset so that we can try to play with it?
Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com> wrote:
I tested 1.70 beta 1 and found some problems when using 8-bit GeoTiffs'.
Not that this would concern only those rasters but I only have them in
my test site. It seems that they would open into the view but nothing
can be seen. Still I get features out of them by clicking the empty screen.You can test them by opening:
http://karjala.digikartta.net/kartat/mapPreview.do
All but the first with dikanet namespace include images. They all worked
with the previous version.- mika -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Eng. Simone Giannecchini
President /CEO GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 0584983027
mob: +39 333 8128928
-------------------------------------------------------
Ciao Mika,
can you copy and paste the style you are using for thi raster? I have
committed the raster symbolizer work on trunk, hence we are becoming
picky with raster styles.
Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi Simone,
firstly, I attached the whole log of today into this message. As far as I
can see, it repeats itself with the same warnings and errors, but maybe it's
better you to see it entirely. Secondly, I could provide you some sample
datasets, but the problem also occurs with the sample data of Geoserver. I
can't see anything e.g. in nurc:mosaic or nurc:Img_Sample. Samples and my
own material without rasters seem to be working just fine through wms.- mika -
Simone Giannecchini kirjoitti:
Ciao Mika,
a few questions:
- do you actually see any error messages in the geoserver log?
- can you provide a sample dataset so that we can try to play with it?Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com>
wrote:I tested 1.70 beta 1 and found some problems when using 8-bit GeoTiffs'.
Not that this would concern only those rasters but I only have them in
my test site. It seems that they would open into the view but nothing
can be seen. Still I get features out of them by clicking the empty screen.You can test them by opening:
http://karjala.digikartta.net/kartat/mapPreview.do
All but the first with dikanet namespace include images. They all worked
with the previous version.- mika -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Eng. Simone Giannecchini
President /CEO GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 0584983027
mob: +39 333 8128928
-------------------------------------------------------
I believe the sample raster style is used in all these samples. Here you are.
- mika -
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<StyledLayerDescriptor xmlns="http://www.opengis.net/sld" xmlns:ogc="http://www.opengis.net/ogc" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.opengis.net/sld
http://schemas.opengis.net/sld/1.0.0/StyledLayerDescriptor.xsd" version="1.0.0">
<UserLayer>
<Name>raster_layer</Name>
<LayerFeatureConstraints>
<FeatureTypeConstraint/>
</LayerFeatureConstraints>
<UserStyle>
<Name>raster</Name>
<Title>A boring default style</Title>
<Abstract>A sample style for rasters</Abstract>
<FeatureTypeStyle>
<FeatureTypeName>Feature</FeatureTypeName>
<Rule>
<RasterSymbolizer>
<Opacity>1.0</Opacity>
<OverlapBehavior>
<AVERAGE/>
</OverlapBehavior>
<ColorMap>
<ColorMapEntry color="#000000" quantity="-500" label="nodata" opacity="0.0"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#00ff00" quantity="-500" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#00fa00" quantity="-417" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#14f500" quantity="-333" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#28f502" quantity="-250" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#3cf505" quantity="-167" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#50f50a" quantity="-83" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#64f014" quantity="-1" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#7deb32" quantity="0" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#78c818" quantity="30" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#38840c" quantity="105" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#2c4b04" quantity="300" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#ffff00" quantity="400" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#dcdc00" quantity="700" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#b47800" quantity="1200" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#c85000" quantity="1400" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#be4100" quantity="1600" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#963000" quantity="2000" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#3c0200" quantity="3000" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#ffffff" quantity="5000" label="values"/>
<ColorMapEntry color="#ffffff" quantity="13000" label="values"/>
</ColorMap>
<ShadedRelief/>
</RasterSymbolizer>
</Rule>
</FeatureTypeStyle>
</UserStyle>
</UserLayer>
</StyledLayerDescriptor>
Simone Giannecchini kirjoitti:
Ciao Mika,
can you copy and paste the style you are using for thi raster? I have
committed the raster symbolizer work on trunk, hence we are becoming
picky with raster styles.Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi Simone,
firstly, I attached the whole log of today into this message. As far as I
can see, it repeats itself with the same warnings and errors, but maybe it's
better you to see it entirely. Secondly, I could provide you some sample
datasets, but the problem also occurs with the sample data of Geoserver. I
can't see anything e.g. in nurc:mosaic or nurc:Img_Sample. Samples and my
own material without rasters seem to be working just fine through wms.- mika -
Simone Giannecchini kirjoitti:
Ciao Mika,
a few questions:
- do you actually see any error messages in the geoserver log?
- can you provide a sample dataset so that we can try to play with it?Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com>
wrote:I tested 1.70 beta 1 and found some problems when using 8-bit GeoTiffs'.
Not that this would concern only those rasters but I only have them in
my test site. It seems that they would open into the view but nothing
can be seen. Still I get features out of them by clicking the empty screen.You can test them by opening:
http://karjala.digikartta.net/kartat/mapPreview.do
All but the first with dikanet namespace include images. They all worked
with the previous version.- mika -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
BTW, Arc_Sample seems to be working with 'raster' style, but if you switch on the tiled option, it won't work anymore. The outcome resembles some works of Andy Warhol.
Is it ok to use the "old" data_dir in 1.70 beta1? The previous version was some 1.6.x latest from http://gridlock.openplans.org/geoserver/1.6.x/ , but I believe the data_dir is originated from 1.6.3 or 1.6.4 stable, not sure though.
- mika -
Simone Giannecchini kirjoitti:
Ciao Mika,
can you copy and paste the style you are using for thi raster? I have
committed the raster symbolizer work on trunk, hence we are becoming
picky with raster styles.Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi Simone,
firstly, I attached the whole log of today into this message. As far as I
can see, it repeats itself with the same warnings and errors, but maybe it's
better you to see it entirely. Secondly, I could provide you some sample
datasets, but the problem also occurs with the sample data of Geoserver. I
can't see anything e.g. in nurc:mosaic or nurc:Img_Sample. Samples and my
own material without rasters seem to be working just fine through wms.- mika -
Simone Giannecchini kirjoitti:
Ciao Mika,
a few questions:
- do you actually see any error messages in the geoserver log?
- can you provide a sample dataset so that we can try to play with it?Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com>
wrote:I tested 1.70 beta 1 and found some problems when using 8-bit GeoTiffs'.
Not that this would concern only those rasters but I only have them in
my test site. It seems that they would open into the view but nothing
can be seen. Still I get features out of them by clicking the empty screen.You can test them by opening:
http://karjala.digikartta.net/kartat/mapPreview.do
All but the first with dikanet namespace include images. They all worked
with the previous version.- mika -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
Ciao Mika,
my suggestion is simple. Just change the default raster.sld style once
for all to resemble thi
s:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<StyledLayerDescriptor xmlns="http://www.opengis.net/sld"
xmlns:ogc="http://www.opengis.net/ogc"
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.opengis.net/sld
http://schemas.opengis.net/sld/1.0.0/StyledLayerDescriptor.xsd" version="1.0.0">
<UserLayer>
<Name>raster_layer</Name>
<LayerFeatureConstraints>
<FeatureTypeConstraint/>
</LayerFeatureConstraints>
<UserStyle>
<Name>raster</Name>
<Title>A boring default style</Title>
<Abstract>A sample style for rasters</Abstract>
<FeatureTypeStyle>
<FeatureTypeName>Feature</FeatureTypeName>
<Rule>
<RasterSymbolizer>
<Opacity>1.0</Opacity>
</RasterSymbolizer>
</Rule>
</FeatureTypeStyle>
</UserStyle>
</UserLayer>
</StyledLayerDescriptor>
This way the rastersymbolizer will be bypassed and everything should
work as before, when you were not using the rastersymbolizer.
If you have some coverage where you want to use the rastersymbolizer
then you need to define the needed rules following SLD 1.0.
Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com> wrote:
BTW, Arc_Sample seems to be working with 'raster' style, but if you
switch on the tiled option, it won't work anymore. The outcome resembles
some works of Andy Warhol.Is it ok to use the "old" data_dir in 1.70 beta1? The previous version
was some 1.6.x latest from
http://gridlock.openplans.org/geoserver/1.6.x/ , but I believe the
data_dir is originated from 1.6.3 or 1.6.4 stable, not sure though.- mika -
Simone Giannecchini kirjoitti:
Ciao Mika,
can you copy and paste the style you are using for thi raster? I have
committed the raster symbolizer work on trunk, hence we are becoming
picky with raster styles.Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi Simone,
firstly, I attached the whole log of today into this message. As far as I
can see, it repeats itself with the same warnings and errors, but maybe it's
better you to see it entirely. Secondly, I could provide you some sample
datasets, but the problem also occurs with the sample data of Geoserver. I
can't see anything e.g. in nurc:mosaic or nurc:Img_Sample. Samples and my
own material without rasters seem to be working just fine through wms.- mika -
Simone Giannecchini kirjoitti:
Ciao Mika,
a few questions:
- do you actually see any error messages in the geoserver log?
- can you provide a sample dataset so that we can try to play with it?Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com>
wrote:I tested 1.70 beta 1 and found some problems when using 8-bit GeoTiffs'.
Not that this would concern only those rasters but I only have them in
my test site. It seems that they would open into the view but nothing
can be seen. Still I get features out of them by clicking the empty screen.You can test them by opening:
http://karjala.digikartta.net/kartat/mapPreview.do
All but the first with dikanet namespace include images. They all worked
with the previous version.- mika -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Eng. Simone Giannecchini
President /CEO GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 0584983027
mob: +39 333 8128928
-------------------------------------------------------
Ok,
I see. But unfortunately one step ahead, two steps back. See:
http://karjala.digikartta.net/kartat/index.html
I already once get a rid of those black triangles. Now they are back again. What is causing them? If I recall right, there were some 'quick-n-dirty' means done, in order to get rid of them. Making black transparent or like that. This transparency thing seems to be still haunting on top of the geoserver raster utilizing.
If you remember this case, there are some EPSG:2393 rasters transformed into 2394.
- mika -
Simone Giannecchini kirjoitti:
Ciao Mika,
my suggestion is simple. Just change the default raster.sld style once
for all to resemble thi
s:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<StyledLayerDescriptor xmlns="http://www.opengis.net/sld"
xmlns:ogc="http://www.opengis.net/ogc"
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.opengis.net/sld
http://schemas.opengis.net/sld/1.0.0/StyledLayerDescriptor.xsd" version="1.0.0">
<UserLayer>
<Name>raster_layer</Name>
<LayerFeatureConstraints>
<FeatureTypeConstraint/>
</LayerFeatureConstraints>
<UserStyle>
<Name>raster</Name>
<Title>A boring default style</Title>
<Abstract>A sample style for rasters</Abstract>
<FeatureTypeStyle>
<FeatureTypeName>Feature</FeatureTypeName>
<Rule>
<RasterSymbolizer>
<Opacity>1.0</Opacity>
</RasterSymbolizer>
</Rule>
</FeatureTypeStyle>
</UserStyle>
</UserLayer>
</StyledLayerDescriptor>This way the rastersymbolizer will be bypassed and everything should
work as before, when you were not using the rastersymbolizer.
If you have some coverage where you want to use the rastersymbolizer
then you need to define the needed rules following SLD 1.0.Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com> wrote:
BTW, Arc_Sample seems to be working with 'raster' style, but if you
switch on the tiled option, it won't work anymore. The outcome resembles
some works of Andy Warhol.Is it ok to use the "old" data_dir in 1.70 beta1? The previous version
was some 1.6.x latest from
http://gridlock.openplans.org/geoserver/1.6.x/ , but I believe the
data_dir is originated from 1.6.3 or 1.6.4 stable, not sure though.- mika -
Simone Giannecchini kirjoitti:
Ciao Mika,
can you copy and paste the style you are using for thi raster? I have
committed the raster symbolizer work on trunk, hence we are becoming
picky with raster styles.Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com> wrote:
Hi Simone,
firstly, I attached the whole log of today into this message. As far as I
can see, it repeats itself with the same warnings and errors, but maybe it's
better you to see it entirely. Secondly, I could provide you some sample
datasets, but the problem also occurs with the sample data of Geoserver. I
can't see anything e.g. in nurc:mosaic or nurc:Img_Sample. Samples and my
own material without rasters seem to be working just fine through wms.- mika -
Simone Giannecchini kirjoitti:
Ciao Mika,
a few questions:
- do you actually see any error messages in the geoserver log?
- can you provide a sample dataset so that we can try to play with it?Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com>
wrote:I tested 1.70 beta 1 and found some problems when using 8-bit GeoTiffs'.
Not that this would concern only those rasters but I only have them in
my test site. It seems that they would open into the view but nothing
can be seen. Still I get features out of them by clicking the empty screen.You can test them by opening:
http://karjala.digikartta.net/kartat/mapPreview.do
All but the first with dikanet namespace include images. They all worked
with the previous version.- mika -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
Ciao Mika,
just to separate concerns:
1> can you confirm that the problems with the number of bands for the
rastersymbolzier are solved now?
2> about the mosaic, we spotte this morning a bug in the new config
which prevents the loading of the coverage configuration where the
read parameters are loaded. This bug should be fixed as of now.
3> i did not clearly, understood the other problem you mentioned with
the ascii grid sample data.
Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com> wrote:
Ok,
I see. But unfortunately one step ahead, two steps back. See:
http://karjala.digikartta.net/kartat/index.html
I already once get a rid of those black triangles. Now they are back again.
What is causing them? If I recall right, there were some 'quick-n-dirty'
means done, in order to get rid of them. Making black transparent or like
that. This transparency thing seems to be still haunting on top of the
geoserver raster utilizing.If you remember this case, there are some EPSG:2393 rasters transformed into
2394.- mika -
Simone Giannecchini kirjoitti:
Ciao Mika,
my suggestion is simple. Just change the default raster.sld style once
for all to resemble thi
s:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<StyledLayerDescriptor xmlns="http://www.opengis.net/sld"
xmlns:ogc="http://www.opengis.net/ogc"
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.opengis.net/sld
http://schemas.opengis.net/sld/1.0.0/StyledLayerDescriptor.xsd"
version="1.0.0">
<UserLayer>
<Name>raster_layer</Name>
<LayerFeatureConstraints>
<FeatureTypeConstraint/>
</LayerFeatureConstraints>
<UserStyle>
<Name>raster</Name>
<Title>A boring default style</Title>
<Abstract>A sample style for rasters</Abstract>
<FeatureTypeStyle>
<FeatureTypeName>Feature</FeatureTypeName>
<Rule>
<RasterSymbolizer>
<Opacity>1.0</Opacity>
</RasterSymbolizer>
</Rule>
</FeatureTypeStyle>
</UserStyle>
</UserLayer>
</StyledLayerDescriptor>This way the rastersymbolizer will be bypassed and everything should
work as before, when you were not using the rastersymbolizer.
If you have some coverage where you want to use the rastersymbolizer
then you need to define the needed rules following SLD 1.0.Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com>
wrote:BTW, Arc_Sample seems to be working with 'raster' style, but if you
switch on the tiled option, it won't work anymore. The outcome resembles
some works of Andy Warhol.Is it ok to use the "old" data_dir in 1.70 beta1? The previous version
was some 1.6.x latest from
http://gridlock.openplans.org/geoserver/1.6.x/ , but I believe the
data_dir is originated from 1.6.3 or 1.6.4 stable, not sure though.- mika -
Simone Giannecchini kirjoitti:
Ciao Mika,
can you copy and paste the style you are using for thi raster? I have
committed the raster symbolizer work on trunk, hence we are becoming
picky with raster styles.Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com>
wrote:Hi Simone,
firstly, I attached the whole log of today into this message. As far as
I
can see, it repeats itself with the same warnings and errors, but maybe
it's
better you to see it entirely. Secondly, I could provide you some
sample
datasets, but the problem also occurs with the sample data of
Geoserver. I
can't see anything e.g. in nurc:mosaic or nurc:Img_Sample. Samples and
my
own material without rasters seem to be working just fine through wms.- mika -
Simone Giannecchini kirjoitti:
Ciao Mika,
a few questions:
- do you actually see any error messages in the geoserver log?
- can you provide a sample dataset so that we can try to play with it?Simone.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com>
wrote:I tested 1.70 beta 1 and found some problems when using 8-bit
GeoTiffs'.
Not that this would concern only those rasters but I only have them in
my test site. It seems that they would open into the view but nothing
can be seen. Still I get features out of them by clicking the empty
screen.You can test them by opening:
http://karjala.digikartta.net/kartat/mapPreview.do
All but the first with dikanet namespace include images. They all
worked
with the previous version.- mika -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Eng. Simone Giannecchini
President /CEO GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 0584983027
mob: +39 333 8128928
-------------------------------------------------------
Simone Giannecchini kirjoitti:
1) I believe so. It works otherwise but the transparecy thing is having
some problems. See the first image. Has #2 something to do with that?
3) See the latter image. If I switch the tile mode on (in MapPreview), the result is like that. Same happens with geotiffs', if the tile mode is on.
reg. mika
<img src="cid:part1.05060508.04010601@anonymised.com" alt="">
<img src="cid:part2.04060702.03030208@anonymised.com" alt="">
Ciao MIka,
please, read below....
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Lehtonen, Mika <mika@anonymised.com> wrote:
Simone Giannecchini kirjoitti:
Ciao Mika,
just to separate concerns:1> can you confirm that the problems with the number of bands for the
rastersymbolzier are solved now?2> about the mosaic, we spotte this morning a bug in the new config
which prevents the loading of the coverage configuration where the
read parameters are loaded. This bug should be fixed as of now.3> i did not clearly, understood the other problem you mentioned with
the ascii grid sample data.Simone.
1) I believe so. It works otherwise but the transparecy thing is having
some problems. See the first image. Has #2 something to do with that?
Yeah, at least in our tests. The new configuration was not
unmarshalling correctly the read parameters whic controla the
transparency, hence they were not respected.
I think we need to test this with the next release of the 1.7 series.
3) See the latter image. If I switch the tile mode on (in MapPreview), the
result is like that. Same happens with geotiffs', if the tile mode is on.
Mmmmhh, this is strange, I will test things a little bit later today
then I will come back to you with more thoughts/questions.
Simone.
reg. mika
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Eng. Simone Giannecchini
President /CEO GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 0584983027
mob: +39 333 8128928
-------------------------------------------------------