A few question about differen jre versions and jai:
- Geoserver 2.6 supports now officially also OpenJDK7 but has anybody tested if Oracle jre7 is still as much faster as it is with jre6 versions http://boundlessgeo.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/4.4.png?
- Is installation of native JAI for jre7 versions still similar than in document http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/production/java.html and is it recommended for both Oracle and OpenJDK when it is possible?
- Combination 64-bit jre + native jai is not supported on Windows. When to select 32-bit jre + jai and when 64-bit jre without native jai?
- Any opinions about jre8?
Has anyone determined if using 64-bit jre7 on Windows with GeoServer 2.6.2 is
better than using the 32-bit jre7 and native jai? I am in the process of
updating my GeoServer from 2.5.3 and have previously used the 32-bit jre6
and native jai. Just wondering if anyone has directly compared the two and
has an opinion of which setup is better.
We need to retest (and that would be a useful contribution to the community).
A lot of time is spent encoding images - but libjpeg turbo and the PNG encoding improvements andrea have made should be much faster than out of the box JRE image encoding. Is that faster than natvie JAI on your hardware? Please measure and report back …
Has anyone determined if using 64-bit jre7 on Windows with GeoServer 2.6.2 is
better than using the 32-bit jre7 and native jai? I am in the process of
updating my GeoServer from 2.5.3 and have previously used the 32-bit jre6
and native jai. Just wondering if anyone has directly compared the two and
has an opinion of which setup is better.
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
