On Jan 14, 2009, at 6:35 AM, <grass-dev-request@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:55:47 -0600
From: William Kyngesburye <woklist@kyngchaos.com>
Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] 64 bit compiling of GRASS 7 on Mac -
/lib/vector/diglib fails
To: Michael Barton <michael.barton@asu.edu>
Cc: grass developers <grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org>
Message-ID: <12C25FC2-2E73-49B7-A10D-1098EBAFB329@kyngchaos.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
On Jan 13, 2009, at 9:34 PM, Michael Barton wrote:
gcc -L/Users/cmbarton/grass_dev/grass7_src/dist.i386-apple-
darwin9.6.0/lib -arch i386 -arch i386 -Os -arch i386 -arch i386 -
Os -arch i386 -arch x86_64 -Os -
Ah, here could be the problem - either your CFLAGS or LDFLAGS export
has 2 i386 flags, missing x86_64.
You were right William. It compiled with a complaint only from xganim. However, you were also right in that in spite of compiling, stuff doesn't work well. Too bad that we can't compile 64 bit on the Mac. 
Michael
On Jan 14, 2009, at 11:31 AM, Michael Barton wrote:
You were right William. It compiled with a complaint only from xganim. However, you were also right in that in spite of compiling, stuff doesn't work well. Too bad that we can't compile 64 bit on the Mac. 
Michael
yeah, just tried 64bit v.in.ogr in trunk, and it still crashes. I (finally) submitted a bug report to get the ball rolling to fix it.
-----
William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos*at*kyngchaos*dot*com>
http://www.kyngchaos.com/
Earth: "Mostly harmless"
- revised entry in the HitchHiker's Guide to the Galaxy
William Kyngesburye wrote:
On Jan 14, 2009, at 11:31 AM, Michael Barton wrote:
You were right William. It compiled with a complaint only from xganim. However, you were also right in that in spite of compiling, stuff doesn't work well. Too bad that we can't compile 64 bit on the Mac.
Michael
yeah, just tried 64bit v.in.ogr in trunk, and it still crashes. I (finally) submitted a bug report to get the ball rolling to fix it.
Not that I know anything about compiling on Mac, but was gdal compiled with -arch i386 or -arch x86_64? Just an idea, GRASS links against gdal and ogr libraries, and if they were compiled for a different architecture (i386 instead of x86_64), it won't work.
Markus M
-----
William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos*at*kyngchaos*dot*com>
http://www.kyngchaos.com/
Earth: "Mostly harmless"
- revised entry in the HitchHiker's Guide to the Galaxy
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Markus Metz wrote:
yeah, just tried 64bit v.in.ogr in trunk, and it still crashes. I (finally) submitted a bug report to get the ball rolling to fix it.
Not that I know anything about compiling on Mac, but was gdal compiled with -arch i386 or -arch x86_64? Just an idea, GRASS links against gdal and ogr libraries, and if they were compiled for a different architecture (i386 instead of x86_64), it won't work.
yes, all my frameworks are ppc+intel, 32+64bit. It's crashing after the import step, in the cleaning steps (see bug report).
-----
William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos*at*kyngchaos*dot*com>
http://www.kyngchaos.com/
"This is a question about the past, is it? ... How can I tell that the past isn't a fiction designed to account for the discrepancy between my immediate physical sensations and my state of mind?"
- The Ruler of the Universe