I don’t think it is a good idea to close tickets as “wontfix” because of “No activity”. The issues might still be relevant. I suggest to ping the appropriate maintainer(s) instead.
“wontfix” should IMHO be used if a ticket can not be fixed for technical reasons.
I don’t think it is a good idea to close tickets as “wontfix” because of “No activity”. The issues might still be relevant. I suggest to ping the appropriate maintainer(s) instead.
so 9. 2. 2019 v 22:42 odesílatel Markus Metz
<markus.metz.giswork@gmail.com> napsal:
I don't think it is a good idea to close tickets as "wontfix" because of "No activity". The issues might still be relevant. I suggest to ping the appropriate maintainer(s) instead.
"wontfix" should IMHO be used if a ticket can not be fixed for technical reasons.
I tend to agree. To my experience, usually pinging the
reporter/"maintainer" does not work. So maybe closing ticket will have
another effect Feel free to reopen relevant issues.