Hi PSC,
while this is of course also quite a grass-dev topic, I thought to
bring it up here:
we are a bit lagging behind with accepting new core developers. Since
folks are shy 
we should invite them.
Please let's avoid a public discussion here about names but we should
reflect about how to identify (perhaps "grow") new core developers.
Best,
Markus
Le 10 mai 2017 20:26:16 GMT+02:00, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> a écrit :
Hi PSC,
while this is of course also quite a grass-dev topic, I thought to
bring it up here:
we are a bit lagging behind with accepting new core developers. Since
folks are shyPlease let's avoid a public discussion here about names but we should
reflect about how to identify (perhaps "grow") new core developers.
+1 on the principle.
But how do you actually define "core developer" ? I actually see this a quite fluidly with most developers having spells of more intense investment and others moments of less.
Moritz
Best,
Markus
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Moritz Lennert
<mlennert@club.worldonline.be> wrote:
Le 10 mai 2017 20:26:16 GMT+02:00, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> a écrit :
Hi PSC,
while this is of course also quite a grass-dev topic, I thought to
bring it up here:
we are a bit lagging behind with accepting new core developers. Since
folks are shyPlease let's avoid a public discussion here about names but we should
reflect about how to identify (perhaps "grow") new core developers.+1 on the principle.
But how do you actually define "core developer" ? I actually see this a quite fluidly with most
developers having spells of more intense investment and others moments of less.
Oh, sorry that I wan't clear enough:
Here I mean developers with SVN write access to trunk/relbranches. We
didn't enable new developers for a while...
Markus