still our (Google) ranking of the G7 manual is fairly bad (ideas
welcome how to fix that).
For the time being I have added a HTML injection to the cronjob which
creates the G6 manual pages.
Each page now contains a box, pointing the user to G7.
still our (Google) ranking of the G7 manual is fairly bad (ideas
welcome how to fix that).
I am not a developer, just something I wondered; why not having one permanent address for the manual, which always reflects the latest stable release, and if needed, from there add links to older versions? Obviously not a solution for now, but this would lead, in the future, to more stable and permanent rankings for the most up-to-date version.
For the time being I have added a HTML injection to the cronjob which
creates the G6 manual pages.
Each page now contains a box, pointing the user to G7.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Paulo van Breugel
<p.vanbreugel@gmail.com> wrote:
On 18-08-16 10:22, Markus Neteler wrote:
Hi devs,
right:
s+devs+all+
still our (Google) ranking of the G7 manual is fairly bad (ideas
welcome how to fix that).
I am not a developer, just something I wondered; why not having one
permanent address for the manual, which always reflects the latest stable
release, and if needed, from there add links to older versions? Obviously
not a solution for now, but this would lead, in the future, to more stable
and permanent rankings for the most up-to-date version.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:
> I am not a developer, just something I wondered; why not having one
> permanent address for the manual, which always reflects the latest stable
> release, and if needed, from there add links to older versions? Obviously
> not a solution for now, but this would lead, in the future, to more
stable
> and permanent rankings for the most up-to-date version.
but if the command will be `grass7` (or even `grass`) and the version
always two numbers and the order is not changed to "manuals/grass70", no
conflict will happen.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:
> I am not a developer, just something I wondered; why not having one
> permanent address for the manual, which always reflects the latest
> stable
> release, and if needed, from there add links to older versions?
> Obviously
> not a solution for now, but this would lead, in the future, to more
> stable
> and permanent rankings for the most up-to-date version.
but if the command will be `grass7` (or even `grass`) and the version always
two numbers and the order is not changed to "manuals/grass70", no conflict
will happen.