#2276: r.covar: output N (number of cells considered)
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mlennert | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.4.4
Component: Default | Version: unspecified
Keywords: | Platform: Unspecified
Cpu: Unspecified |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
I just committed (r60035) a small addition to r.covar to output the N
value.
In light of recent discussions: What is our current policy on backporting
this to grass70release and to grass64release ?
It's a new feature, but extremely uninvasive (just an additional fprintf).
Can I backport ?
#2276: r.covar: output N (number of cells considered)
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mlennert | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.4.4
Component: Default | Version: unspecified
Keywords: | Platform: Unspecified
Cpu: Unspecified |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment(by martinl):
Well, such change is really cosmetic...
* relb70 - only bugfixes and non-invasive changes (including new
features). Feature freeze will come later with RC1 (I hope later in the
summer or in the worst case in the autumn). RCs shouldn't take more then
one/two months. I hope that we will have defined release policy in the
near future, so it will be more clear.
* relb64 - we are close to RC, so feature freeze (well the change reported
by you is really minor changes, so no big deal).
Go ahead with backport if you feel that is useful.
#2276: r.covar: output N (number of cells considered)
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mlennert | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.4.4
Component: Default | Version: unspecified
Keywords: | Platform: Unspecified
Cpu: Unspecified |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment(by mlennert):
Backported to all branches (including grass64_release).
I still do think that we should develop a more clearcut policy on this,
and have one person, or a team, decide what can and cannot go into a
release branch.