[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2500: r.surf.idw vs. r.surf.idw2

#2500: r.surf.idw vs. r.surf.idw2
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: martinl | Owner: grass-dev@…
     Type: task | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: Default | Version: svn-trunk
Keywords: | Platform: Unspecified
      Cpu: Unspecified |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Do we need the both modules in G7?

  * could they be merged?
  * or one of them moved to addons

Are there other candidates which could be moved to addons?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2500&gt;
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>

#2500: r.surf.idw vs. r.surf.idw2
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: martinl | Owner: grass-dev@…
     Type: task | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: Default | Version: svn-trunk
Keywords: | Platform: Unspecified
      Cpu: Unspecified |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by martinl):

Any comments? Thanks.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2500#comment:1&gt;
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>

#2500: r.surf.idw vs. r.surf.idw2
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: martinl | Owner: grass-dev@…
     Type: task | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: Default | Version: svn-trunk
Keywords: | Platform: Unspecified
      Cpu: Unspecified |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by annakrat):

Replying to [ticket:2500 martinl]:
> Do we need the both modules in G7?

   * could they be merged?
   * or one of them moved to addons

Even if they could be merged, it would require some work and time. So
based on the r.surf.idw manual page:

{{{
r.surf.idw will generally outperform r.surf.idw2 except when the input
data layer
  contains few non-zero data, i.e. when the cost of the search exceeds
  the cost of the additional distance calculations performed by
r.surf.idw2.
  The relative performance of these utilities will depend on the
comparative
  speed of boolean, integer and floating point operations on a particular
platform.
}}}

and r.surf.idw2 manual page:

{{{
Another surface generation program, named r.surf.idw,
  should be used with latitude/longitude data bases
}}}

I would move r.surf.idw2 to addons. But I don't think I was trying any of
them.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2500#comment:2&gt;
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>

#2500: r.surf.idw vs. r.surf.idw2
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: martinl | Owner: grass-dev@…
     Type: task | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: Default | Version: svn-trunk
Keywords: | Platform: Unspecified
      Cpu: Unspecified |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by martinl):

Replying to [comment:2 annakrat]:

> I would move r.surf.idw2 to addons. But I don't think I was trying any
of them.

I would agree with you. Any objections?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2500#comment:3&gt;
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>

#2500: r.surf.idw vs. r.surf.idw2
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
  Reporter: martinl | Owner: grass-dev@…
      Type: task | Status: closed
  Priority: blocker | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: Default | Version: svn-trunk
Resolution: fixed | Keywords:
  Platform: Unspecified | Cpu: Unspecified
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by martinl):

  * status: new => closed
  * resolution: => fixed

Comment:

Replying to [comment:3 martinl]:
> Replying to [comment:2 annakrat]:
>
> > I would move r.surf.idw2 to addons. But I don't think I was trying any
of them.
>
> I would agree with you. Any objections?

done in r63510 and backported to relbr70 in r63511. Closing this ticket.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2500#comment:4&gt;
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>