[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2557: a few new monochrome color tables (should they be backported) ?

#2557: a few new monochrome color tables (should they be backported) ?
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mlennert | Owner: grass-dev@…
     Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: LibGIS | Version: svn-releasebranch70
Keywords: colortables | Platform: Unspecified
      Cpu: Unspecified |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
I've [https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/64283 just committed to
trunk] a few very basic monochrome color tables for general usage (blues,
greens, oranges, reds). They can very easily be created manually with a
two line color rules definition, and so some might argue that we should
not increase the length of the list of tables, but I think it is handy
(and a support to new users) to have some of such color tables in the list
of predefined tables.

Any objections against backporting them to relbr7 ?

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2557&gt;
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>

#2557: a few new monochrome color tables (should they be backported) ?
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mlennert | Owner: grass-dev@…
     Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: LibGIS | Version: svn-releasebranch70
Keywords: colortables | Platform: Unspecified
      Cpu: Unspecified |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by neteler):

In general fine for me since they are handy.

A curiosity: why did you choose orange and not yellow?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/28/RGB_illumination.jpg
(it would be yellow, cyan, purple as additive mixing colors of RGB)

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2557#comment:1&gt;
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>

#2557: a few new monochrome color tables (should they be backported) ?
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mlennert | Owner: grass-dev@…
     Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: LibGIS | Version: svn-releasebranch70
Keywords: colortables | Platform: Unspecified
      Cpu: Unspecified |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by mlennert):

Replying to [comment:1 neteler]:
> In general fine for me since they are handy.
>
> A curiosity: why did you choose orange and not yellow?

Because I find gradients of yellow not easy to read. Oranges are easier to
read, but less harsh then reds.

Moritz

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2557#comment:2&gt;
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>

#2557: a few new monochrome color tables (should they be backported) ?
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
  Reporter: mlennert | Owner: grass-dev@…
      Type: enhancement | Status: closed
  Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: LibGIS | Version: svn-releasebranch70
Resolution: fixed | Keywords: colortables
  Platform: Unspecified | Cpu: Unspecified
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by wenzeslaus):

  * status: new => closed
  * resolution: => fixed

Comment:

This is part of 7.0.0, so closing as fixed.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2557#comment:3&gt;
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>