GDAL
May 26, 2017, 11:30am
1
#3351: Update r.color manual
------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: Nikos Alexandris | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Docs | Version: svn-trunk
Keywords: r.colors, rules | CPU: Unspecified
Platform: Unspecified |
------------------------------+-------------------------
In the manuals for `r.colors`, versions
[https://grass.osgeo.org/grass72/manuals/r.colors.html 7.2] and
[https://grass.osgeo.org/grass73/manuals/r.colors.html 7.3 ] it reads
One can get a rough idea of the applicability of a colour table by
reading the corresponding rules file (`$GISBASE/etc/colors/<name>`).
Please update the path to `$GISBASE/lib/gis/colors/<name>`.
I guess this applies to all 7.x series?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3351> ;
GRASS GIS <https://grass.osgeo.org >
GDAL
May 26, 2017, 11:35am
2
#3351: Update r.color manual
-------------------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: Nikos Alexandris | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Docs | Version: svn-trunk
Resolution: wontfix | Keywords: r.colors, rules
CPU: Unspecified | Platform: Unspecified
-------------------------------+-----------------------------
Changes (by Nikos Alexandris):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => wontfix
Comment:
I guess the users should indeed look in to the `$GISBASE/etc/colors/`
directory, not the source. Ticket does not apply.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3351#comment:1> ;
GRASS GIS <https://grass.osgeo.org >
GDAL
May 31, 2017, 8:59am
3
#3351: Update r.color manual
-------------------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: Nikos Alexandris | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Docs | Version: svn-trunk
Resolution: wontfix | Keywords: r.colors, rules
CPU: Unspecified | Platform: Unspecified
-------------------------------+-----------------------------
Comment (by neteler):
Doesn't r.colors.out do the job? Maybe we should highlight that.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3351#comment:2> ;
GRASS GIS <https://grass.osgeo.org >
GDAL
June 9, 2018, 5:03am
4
#3351: Update r.color manual
-------------------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: Nikos Alexandris | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Docs | Version: svn-trunk
Resolution: wontfix | Keywords: r.colors, rules
CPU: Unspecified | Platform: Unspecified
-------------------------------+-----------------------------
Comment (by Nikos Alexandris):
Would it make sense to merge down `r.colors.out` to `r.colors`?
The former's option `rules` could then be named `output` in the latter.
And, what about a simple flag that will print out the color rules in the
console, instead of a file?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3351#comment:3> ;
GRASS GIS <https://grass.osgeo.org >
GDAL
June 9, 2018, 2:53pm
5
#3351: Update r.color manual
-------------------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: Nikos Alexandris | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.4.1
Component: Docs | Version: svn-trunk
Resolution: wontfix | Keywords: r.colors, rules
CPU: Unspecified | Platform: Unspecified
-------------------------------+-----------------------------
Changes (by neteler):
* milestone: => 7.4.1
Comment:
Replying to [comment:3 Nikos Alexandris]:
> Would it make sense to merge down `r.colors.out` to `r.colors`?
> The former's option `rules` could then be named `output` in the latter.
This would be a new ticket. Perhaps for G8?
> And, what about a simple flag that will print out the color rules in the
console, instead of a file?
... also part of the new ticket?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3351#comment:4> ;
GRASS GIS <https://grass.osgeo.org >