[GRASS-dev] [GRASS-SVN] r54852 - grass/trunk/lib/gis/colors

Hi,

On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 11:26 PM, <svn_grass@osgeo.org> wrote:

Author: cmbarton
Date: 2013-02-02 14:26:41 -0800 (Sat, 02 Feb 2013)
New Revision: 54852

Modified:
   grass/trunk/lib/gis/colors/srtm_plus
Log:
update to srtm_plus colorable

...

+default 255:255:255

Usually there is not "default" specified, should it be there or not?

Markus

Markus Neteler wrote:

> Modified:
> grass/trunk/lib/gis/colors/srtm_plus
> Log:
> update to srtm_plus colorable
...
> +default 255:255:255

Usually there is not "default" specified, should it be there
or not?

Hi Markus,

I believe it does serve a purpose, perhaps when the color table
is based on fixed values instead of %, and does not extend far
enough to cover the range of the data, but the values are not
null either? In that case the default is white so the above may
be redundant.

best,
Hamish

I asked because it does not exist in any other table.

Markus