Hi Markus,
···
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:43 AM, <svn_grass@osgeo.org> wrote:
Author: neteler
Date: 2014-07-23 02:43:05 -0700 (Wed, 23 Jul 2014)
New Revision: 61363Modified:
grass/branches/releasebranch_7_0/raster/r.in.gdal/main.c
Log:
r.in.gdal: GDALGetCacheMax() is limited to 2GiB, define valid range for memory parameterModified: grass/branches/releasebranch_7_0/raster/r.in.gdal/main.c
— grass/branches/releasebranch_7_0/raster/r.in.gdal/main.c 2014-07-23 09:33:12 UTC (rev 61362)
+++ grass/branches/releasebranch_7_0/raster/r.in.gdal/main.c 2014-07-23 09:43:05 UTC (rev 61363)
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@
parm.memory->key = “memory”;
parm.memory->type = TYPE_INTEGER;
parm.memory->required = NO;
- parm.memory->options = “0-2047”;
parm.memory->description = _(“Cache size (MiB)”);
Any idea why 0-2047? r61362 message doesn’t explain and in fact is related to r61364. Shouldn’t options be changed to something like 1-, 0- or nothing? No reason to have upper limit, or is there some?
Thanks,
Vaclav
parm.target = G_define_option();
@@ -206,6 +207,7 @@
GDALAllRegister();
/* default GDAL memory cache size appears to be only 40 MiB, slowing down r.in.gdal */
if (parm.memory->answer && *parm.memory->answer) {
- /* TODO: GDALGetCacheMax() overflows at 2GiB, implement use of GDALSetCacheMax64() */
GDALSetCacheMax(atol(parm.memory->answer) * 1024 * 1024);
G_verbose_message(_(“Using user memory cache size: %.1f MiB”), GDALGetCacheMax()/1024.0/1024.0);
} else
grass-commit mailing list
grass-commit@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-commit