On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 1:19 PM, <svn_grass@osgeo.org> wrote:
Removed horrible html inserted by libreoffice. Html should be clean now.
Hi Isaac,
please note that we are not adding the header (or footer) to our HTML
documents. The module manual should be just the most inner part of HTML
document starting just with a heading.
Note also that we are now trying to avoid the uppercase tags in HTML (this
is the common and stable trend in past years).
Let us now if something is not clear, so we can fix that.
By the way, I personally edit the source directly, so I avoid the problems
with additional tags easily but if you would have some suggestions about
WYSIWYG editor which would produce clean HTML, it wouldn't be out of
interest for some I think.
Vaclav
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Submitting/Docs
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/raster/r.contour/r.contour.html
Vaclav Petras wrote:
please note that we are not adding the header (or footer) to our HTML
documents. The module manual should be just the most inner part of HTML
document starting just with a heading.
It might be nice if <module>.html files were allowed to contain the
"<html><body>...</html></body>" tags, along with a <head> section
(which would be discarded).
Currently, the presence of "<html>" in the input causes mkhtml.py to
assume that that the file is a complete HTML file, which is just
output verbatim.
Perhaps we can come up with some other way of distinguishing a
complete HTML file from a "fragment" which should be merged with the
--html-description output?
In any case, relatively strict conformance to HTML-4.01-Transitional
and the absence of gratuitous markup (e.g. use of tables for
formatting) are non-optional, which would probably preclude some
WYSIWYG-type editors.
--
Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>