neteler
1
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:46 AM, <svn_grass@osgeo.org> wrote:
Author: annakrat
Date: 2015-02-25 16:46:45 -0800 (Wed, 25 Feb 2015)
New Revision: 64751
Modified:
grass-addons/grass7/raster/r.viewshed.cva/r.viewshed.cva.html
Log:
r.viewshed.cva: fix man page, it tags are not supported
just a small question: the manual is full of <it> - should all be replaced?
Not considering multiple <i> in one line:
grep '<i>' *.html | wc -l
1552
The tag is yet listed here:
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Submitting/Docs#SupportedHTMLTags
Is the point that commands should be in <em>...</em>?
thanks
Markus
On Feb 26, 2015 10:56 AM, “Markus Neteler” <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:46 AM, <svn_grass@osgeo.org> wrote:
Author: annakrat
Date: 2015-02-25 16:46:45 -0800 (Wed, 25 Feb 2015)
New Revision: 64751
Modified:
grass-addons/grass7/raster/r.viewshed.cva/r.viewshed.cva.html
Log:
r.viewshed.cva: fix man page, it tags are not supported
just a small question: the manual is full of - should all be replaced?
Not considering multiple in one line:
grep ‘’ *.html | wc -l
1552
The tag is yet listed here:
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Submitting/Docs#SupportedHTMLTags
Is the point that commands should be in …
It was not . It was not compiling. Otherwise I am not sure if em or i is better.
Anna
thanks
Markus
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev