Hi,
GRASS source code is slowly moving to Git as you probably know. Asking
how can you help? Please review rewritten log messages! See
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3722#comment:20
Report errors to ticket above or answer to this mail.
Thanks! Ma
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
Hi,
út 5. 3. 2019 v 20:17 odesílatel Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com> napsal:
GRASS source code is slowly moving to Git as you probably know. Asking
how can you help? Please review rewritten log messages! See
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3722#comment:20
since I haven't received any comments I assume that there are no
errors in rewritten messages 
Now I would like to ask to help with reducing number of open issues
with target 7.0+, see
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3789#comment:2.
Please go through [1] and close issues which are already fixed or will
be not fixed from given reason. The goal is to decrease number of
issues which will be migrated to target git-based platform, see [2].
Clean table is the best 
I would like to ask especially REPORTES to check their issues and
consider closing at least of part of them. Go to [2] to see your todo
list
Thanks for collaboration and help! Ma
[1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&milestone=8.0.0&milestone=7.8.0&milestone=7.6.1&milestone=7.4.5&milestone=7.2.4&milestone=7.0.7&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=priority&col=milestone&order=priority
[2] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/report/12
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
Hi,
út 26. 3. 2019 v 20:45 odesílatel Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com> napsal:
since I haven't received any comments I assume that there are no
errors in rewritten messages
ah, I forgot, thanks Ondrej Pesek for his review
Ma
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
Hi,
út 26. 3. 2019 v 20:45 odesílatel Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com> napsal:
Now I would like to ask to help with reducing number of open issues
with target 7.0+, see
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3789#comment:2.Please go through [1] and close issues which are already fixed or will
be not fixed from given reason. The goal is to decrease number of
issues which will be migrated to target git-based platform, see [2].
[1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&milestone=8.0.0&milestone=7.8.0&milestone=7.6.1&milestone=7.4.5&milestone=7.2.4&milestone=7.0.7&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=priority&col=milestone&order=priority
first of all, thanks to all how did a review of open tickets
(especially of those which you have been reported [1] !). And also a
kind reminder for those who could do a review in order to close at
least part of open issues [1].
Thanks for help. Ma
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
Hi,
DBMI seems to be missing...
I guess that could be useful as well...
Cheers
Stefan
-----Original Message-----
From: grass-user <grass-user-bounces@lists.osgeo.org> On Behalf Of Martin Landa
Sent: mandag 1. april 2019 11:24
To: GRASS users list <grass-user@lists.osgeo.org>; GRASS developers list <grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [GRASS-user] help with git migration
Hi,
út 26. 3. 2019 v 20:45 odesílatel Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com> napsal:
Now I would like to ask to help with reducing number of open issues
with target 7.0+, see
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3789#comment:2.Please go through [1] and close issues which are already fixed or will
be not fixed from given reason. The goal is to decrease number of
issues which will be migrated to target git-based platform, see [2].
[1]
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=r
eopened&milestone=8.0.0&milestone=7.8.0&milestone=7.6.1&milestone=7.4.
5&milestone=7.2.4&milestone=7.0.7&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=ow
ner&col=type&col=priority&col=milestone&order=priority
first of all, thanks to all how did a review of open tickets (especially of those which you have been reported [1] !). And also a kind reminder for those who could do a review in order to close at least part of open issues [1].
Thanks for help. Ma
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
On 1/04/19 11:24, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi,
út 26. 3. 2019 v 20:45 odesílatel Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com> napsal:
Now I would like to ask to help with reducing number of open issues
with target 7.0+, see
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3789#comment:2.Please go through [1] and close issues which are already fixed or will
be not fixed from given reason. The goal is to decrease number of
issues which will be migrated to target git-based platform, see [2].
[1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&milestone=8.0.0&milestone=7.8.0&milestone=7.6.1&milestone=7.4.5&milestone=7.2.4&milestone=7.0.7&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=priority&col=milestone&order=priorityfirst of all, thanks to all how did a review of open tickets
(especially of those which you have been reported [1] !). And also a
kind reminder for those who could do a review in order to close at
least part of open issues [1].
I would suggest to alreay eliminate all enhancement requests that are older than a certain age (1 year) ?
I think that if these requests still correspond to user wishes, they will reappear.
I checked the actual bug tickets I reported and all of them still seem to be valid.
Moritz
Thanks for help. Ma
Hi,
po 1. 4. 2019 v 11:45 odesílatel Moritz Lennert
<mlennert@club.worldonline.be> napsal:
I would suggest to alreay eliminate all enhancement requests that are
older than a certain age (1 year) ?I think that if these requests still correspond to user wishes, they
will reappear.
make sense to me.
I checked the actual bug tickets I reported and all of them still seem
to be valid.
Thanks, Ma
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
Hi,
El lun., 1 abr. 2019 06:59, Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com> escribió:
Hi,
po 1. 4. 2019 v 11:45 odesílatel Moritz Lennert
<mlennert@club.worldonline.be> napsal:I would suggest to alreay eliminate all enhancement requests that are
older than a certain age (1 year) ?I think that if these requests still correspond to user wishes, they
will reappear.make sense to me.
I went through all the tickets opened by me last week as it was requested. I didn’t change the feature request ones because that didn’t change, i.e., they are still valid.
So, you say I should put ‘I still want this, guys’ to avoid the tickets being closed just because they are older than 1 year?
Best,
Vero
On 1/04/19 12:10, Veronica Andreo wrote:
Hi,
El lun., 1 abr. 2019 06:59, Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com <mailto:landa.martin@gmail.com>> escribió:
Hi,
po 1. 4. 2019 v 11:45 odesílatel Moritz Lennert
<mlennert@club.worldonline.be <mailto:mlennert@club.worldonline.be>>
napsal:
> I would suggest to alreay eliminate all enhancement requests that are
> older than a certain age (1 year) ?
>
> I think that if these requests still correspond to user wishes, they
> will reappear.make sense to me.
I went through all the tickets opened by me last week as it was requested. I didn't change the feature request ones because that didn't change, i.e., they are still valid.
So, you say I should put 'I still want this, guys' to avoid the tickets being closed just because they are older than 1 year?
That was just my suggestion. From your reaction it sounds like it was not a very good one ?
Moritz
Hola
El jue., 4 abr. 2019 13:59, Moritz Lennert <mlennert@club.worldonline.be> escribió:
On 1/04/19 12:10, Veronica Andreo wrote:
Hi,
El lun., 1 abr. 2019 06:59, Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com
mailto:[landa.martin@gmail.com](mailto:landa.martin@gmail.com)> escribió:Hi,
po 1. 4. 2019 v 11:45 odesílatel Moritz Lennert
<mlennert@club.worldonline.be mailto:[mlennert@club.worldonline.be](mailto:mlennert@club.worldonline.be)>
napsal:I would suggest to alreay eliminate all enhancement requests that are
older than a certain age (1 year) ?I think that if these requests still correspond to user wishes, they
will reappear.make sense to me.
I went through all the tickets opened by me last week as it was
requested. I didn’t change the feature request ones because that didn’t
change, i.e., they are still valid.So, you say I should put ‘I still want this, guys’ to avoid the tickets
being closed just because they are older than 1 year?That was just my suggestion. From your reaction it sounds like it was
not a very good one ?
Well, not in my opinion. Others can tell better maybe.
However, I did check all the tickets I have opened and only closed those for which either the problem was already fixed or I could not reproduce anymore. The enhancements tickets that I opened are still valid IMHO. I understand this might not always be the case, but I don’t think we can decide so easily and so automatically (except for grass6 or so) and I find it also a bit disrespectful with users… This is my view, though… If you still want to close them, I’ll open them again in GitHub
Cheers,
Vero