[GRASS-dev] is there a naming convention for imagery modules dedicated to specific satellites

GRASS GRASS developer
1

Hello,

Is there a convention on naming for i.* modules dedicated to a given satellite?
r.in.srtm
r.in.aster
i.in.spotvgt
i.landsat.rgb
etc...

"r" or "i"
r.* or i.*
for import (r.in.* or i.in.*)
For import, is it a special case,
or shall we put function name first, then satellite name?
Or for non-import functions we should put satellite first then function?

Is there a common voice, or is it an open discussion.
thanks
Yann

--
Yann Chemin
International Rice Research Institute
Office: http://www.irri.org/gis
Perso: http://www.freewebs.com/ychemin
YiKingDo: http://yikingdo.unblog.fr/

2

Yann,

On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Yann Chemin <yann.chemin@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

Is there a convention on naming for i.* modules dedicated to a given satellite?

"sort of"...

Import:

r.in.srtm
r.in.aster
i.in.spotvgt

... obviously it isn't consistent if r. or i. I guess most folks
(meanwhile) expect
r.in.something.

Doing something *with* the maps:

i.landsat.rgb
etc...

... which looks ok to me.

Markus