r.out.vrml is right (and p.out.vrml just a link for backward
compatibility):
2006-11-02 07:12 hamish
* Makefile, description.html, main.c, put_grid.c, put_view.c, pv.h,
vrml.c: move p.out.vrml to r.out.vrml in source tree (previously
renamed) ** removed unused paint/ dir **
Markus
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:49:04PM -0700, Michael Barton wrote:
I¹m trying to catch up with new commands not in the GUI menu.
What is the difference between r.out.vrml and p.out.vrml. They both have the
same description.
Michael
__________________________________________
Michael Barton, Professor of Anthropology
School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
Arizona State University
r.li.patch* all use the same CLI parameters (meanPatchSize too), so I
suggest lumping them all together in a single r.li.patch command, with a
"tool=" or "option=" parameter to select the analysis wanted.
Alternatively just lump r.li.patchAreaDistribution* into "r.li.pad" with
a tool= or option= parameter for those three.
then just r.li.contrastWeightedEdgeDensity and r.li.meanPixelAttribute
are left to rename. (r.li.wed + r.li.mpa ??)
r.li.patch* all use the same CLI parameters (meanPatchSize too), so I
suggest lumping them all together in a single r.li.patch command, with a
"tool=" or "option=" parameter to select the analysis wanted.
Alternatively just lump r.li.patchAreaDistribution* into "r.li.pad" with
a tool= or option= parameter for those three.
then just r.li.contrastWeightedEdgeDensity and r.li.meanPixelAttribute
are left to rename. (r.li.wed + r.li.mpa ??)
Hamish
__________________________________________
Michael Barton, Professor of Anthropology
School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
Arizona State University