[GRASS-dev] New splash screen for GRASS GIS 7?

I agree with Moritz’s concern. This is a GRASS strongpoint and a failing of most other GIS packages. Ironically, with other packages like Arc and QGIS, users think they know what they are doing but they don’t. With GRASS they realize that they don’t know what they are doing before they start :-/

That said, if we can make starting the program and selecting a location/projection and mapset to work in less intimidating, I’m supportive of trying to do so. I don’t think that GRASS 7.0 RC2 is the place to experiment with this in the interests of doing a faster release. Maybe 7.1

Michael


C. Michael Barton
Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Head, Graduate Faculty in Complex Adaptive Systems Science
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ 85287-2402
USA

voice: 480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-965-8130/727-9746 (CSDC)
fax: 480-965-7671(SHESC), 480-727-0709 (CSDC)
www: http://csdc.asu.edu, http://shesc.asu.edu
http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton

On Jan 21, 2015, at 1:00 PM, grass-dev-request@lists.osgeo.org wrote:

From: Helena Mitasova <hmitaso@ncsu.edu>

Cc: GRASS developers list <grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org>

To: Moritz Lennert <mlennert@club.worldonline.be>

Date: January 21, 2015 at 12:50:58 PM MST

Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] New splash screen for GRASS GIS 7?

On Jan 21, 2015, at 2:16 PM, Moritz Lennert wrote:

On 21/01/15 19:35, Markus Neteler wrote:

On Jan 21, 2015 6:56 PM, “Vaclav Petras” <wenzeslaus@gmail.com
<mailto:wenzeslaus@gmail.com>> wrote:

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org

<mailto:neteler@osgeo.org>> wrote:

The “project” has been introduced in the past to de-confuse user
coming from “other” GIS.
“Location” alone is not quite clear I fear.

I see the motivation but random rename of one thing at one place is

just adding to confusion. If we need explanation, then we need something
like explanation in some less prominent color, similarly to what is in
GUI elsewhere (see attachment). Broad rename is out of question I guess.

Project is very ambiguous, it is location, mapset or GUI workspace?

For me project is usually mapset, sometimes in combination with GUI
workspace and this how I explain that to people.

In my opinion we should not have the location selection dialog at all.
Revolution!

We should start GRASS right away in latlong like most GIS in the world.

Then let the user open the dialog to change projection if desired from
inside.

This would avoid a lot of questions right away.

Please don’t do this ! I find the fact that GRASS does not provide a default projection system, but forces the user to think about projection from the start, one of its strengths, both for work and for teaching.

Moritz - that won’t be lost, I agree that it is a very important GRASS feature.

The concept of location/mapset remains, but they will have to start thinking about it once they start GRASS,
not before they even open it. In my class when we go through starting GRASS step-by-step, the students are fine (although there is
still the problem that some unzip apps create an extra directory when unzipping the files automatically which people don’t notice),
but when in workshops or when on their own I have seen users struggling to get GRASS even open because they give it wrong path
(e.g., to the location rather than gis directory) or they don’t know what to select and whether to create a new location or new mapset.
I am not sure how well the approach of selecting the location from within GRASS will work, but I am willing to give it a try.
I have just written the chapter on creating new locations and reprojecting data in GRASS for the 4th edition of grassbook so I will have to rewrite it,
but this also made me aware of how cumbersome the startup page may be for new users.

On the other hand I just discovered how easy and elegant is to start GRASS from command line and skip the startup screen altogether.

I am not pushing strongly for this change - we can try this first in our lab on real-world projects with newcomers and experienced users
and see whether it would help or whether it would cause even more confusion,

Helena

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Michael Barton <Michael.Barton@asu.edu>
wrote:

I agree with Moritz’s concern. This is a GRASS strongpoint and a failing
of most other GIS packages. Ironically, with other packages like Arc and
QGIS, users *think* they know what they are doing but they don’t. With
GRASS they realize that they don’t know what they are doing before they
start :-/

That said, if we can make starting the program and selecting a
location/projection and mapset to work in less intimidating, I’m supportive
of trying to do so. I don’t think that GRASS 7.0 RC2 is the place to
experiment with this in the interests of doing a faster release. Maybe 7.1

+1

I would say, we should consider the new approach, but just suggesting
"start grass in latlon and then change it" won't get many votes. If you
think it's worth trying, some more complete suggestion should be presented,
and we can certainly talk about that, but please not for this release.
Let's focus on some minor improvements, for example what Michael suggested
with the steps or Vasek mentioned some ways to show users some helpful
messages.

Anna

Michael
            ______________________________
C. Michael Barton
Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Head, Graduate Faculty in Complex Adaptive Systems Science
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ 85287-2402
USA

voice: 480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-965-8130/727-9746 (CSDC)
fax: 480-965-7671(SHESC), 480-727-0709 (CSDC)
www: http://csdc.asu.edu, http://shesc.asu.edu
http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton

On Jan 21, 2015, at 1:00 PM, grass-dev-request@lists.osgeo.org wrote:

*From: *Helena Mitasova <hmitaso@ncsu.edu>
*Cc: *GRASS developers list <grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org>
*To: *Moritz Lennert <mlennert@club.worldonline.be>
*Date: *January 21, 2015 at 12:50:58 PM MST
*Subject: **Re: [GRASS-dev] New splash screen for GRASS GIS 7?*

On Jan 21, 2015, at 2:16 PM, Moritz Lennert wrote:

On 21/01/15 19:35, Markus Neteler wrote:

On Jan 21, 2015 6:56 PM, "Vaclav Petras" <wenzeslaus@gmail.com
<mailto:wenzeslaus@gmail.com <wenzeslaus@gmail.com>>> wrote:

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org

<mailto:neteler@osgeo.org <neteler@osgeo.org>>> wrote:

The "project" has been introduced in the past to de-confuse user
coming from "other" GIS.
"Location" alone is not quite clear I fear.

I see the motivation but random rename of one thing at one place is

just adding to confusion. If we need explanation, then we need something
like explanation in some less prominent color, similarly to what is in
GUI elsewhere (see attachment). Broad rename is out of question I guess.

Project is very ambiguous, it is location, mapset or GUI workspace?

For me project is usually mapset, sometimes in combination with GUI
workspace and this how I explain that to people.

In my opinion we should not have the location selection dialog at all.
Revolution!

We should start GRASS right away in latlong like most GIS in the world.

Then let the user open the dialog to change projection if desired from
inside.

This would avoid a lot of questions right away.

Please don't do this ! I find the fact that GRASS does not provide a
default projection system, but forces the user to think about projection
from the start, one of its strengths, both for work and for teaching.

Moritz - that won't be lost, I agree that it is a very important GRASS
feature.

The concept of location/mapset remains, but they will have to start
thinking about it once they start GRASS,
not before they even open it. In my class when we go through starting
GRASS step-by-step, the students are fine (although there is
still the problem that some unzip apps create an extra directory when
unzipping the files automatically which people don't notice),
but when in workshops or when on their own I have seen users struggling to
get GRASS even open because they give it wrong path
(e.g., to the location rather than gis directory) or they don't know what
to select and whether to create a new location or new mapset.
I am not sure how well the approach of selecting the location from within
GRASS will work, but I am willing to give it a try.
I have just written the chapter on creating new locations and reprojecting
data in GRASS for the 4th edition of grassbook so I will have to rewrite it,
but this also made me aware of how cumbersome the startup page may be for
new users.

On the other hand I just discovered how easy and elegant is to start GRASS
from command line and skip the startup screen altogether.

I am not pushing strongly for this change - we can try this first in our
lab on real-world projects with newcomers and experienced users
and see whether it would help or whether it would cause even more
confusion,

Helena

_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Hi,
thanks to all those who sent feedback on my strictly cosmetic contrib'.
Nikos & Luca: sorry for the flashy green tone, I'm daltonic...
Markus and Michael: do you think of a particular historical map ? would
a partial view on the map do the job ?

Well, to be continued then...

On the other hand of that surprisingly branchy thread: myself teaching
GRASS to students too, I deplore that many pretended GIS-aware students
(having skills with end-user oriented software) at the end of the day
show very poor knowledge in geodetics, projection systems, etc. Starting
with GRASS forces them to go back to basics: the quite unusual starting
process associated with the location/projection selector to my mind
is /very/ helpful !

Good night,
V.