On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Luca Delucchi <lucadeluge@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 27 June 2014 15:46, Anna Petrášová <kratochanna@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Luca Delucchi <lucadeluge@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> On 26 June 2014 19:59, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > nice work, Luca (and thanks to Anna for code cleanup).
>> >
>>
>> Sorry Anna, but I don't understand because you remove all the 3D code,
>> I would like to implement it later (sometime I'm careless but not this
>> time )
>> Thanks for the improvement of coordinates field.
>
>
> Sorry for that. I also fixed some other minor things in that commit. Do
you
> plan to support vector data as well?
>
I would like, first I need a vector temporal dataset to test
> What I am not sure about is the usage of pygrass here. The problem is if
we
> would like to integrate it more in GUI. Currently when you click on the
> g.gui.tplot in menu, a standard generated dialog opens and when you fill
the
> params and press ok, the actual plotting gui shows up, which is
cumbersome.
yes I have your same feeling, I should create a function like for
animation tool?
(other tools have the same behavior of g.gui.tplot for example
g.gui.timeline)
> The menu entry could bring directly the tplot, however then there is a
> possibility of crashing entire GUI when something goes wrong (because of
> using ctypes in pygrass). So one option is to call some t.* module but
there
> is no t.rast.what only t.vect.strds.observe which requires vector map.
I could use r.what instead pygrass but I would like to escape to call
external modules
> Another option is to wrap the pygrass code and call it as a subprocess. I
> don't have time to look at it more now, but we should be aware of this.
>
Just to know, we don't have the same problem using ctypes in the gui?
In several modules we are using it....
yes we have, digitizer and nviz, I just want to avoid another one when it
would be relatively simple (comparing to those 2) make it safe. r.what
could be a simple solution, although it would be probably slower than
pygrass (not sure if significantly, maybe not).
> Anna
--
ciao
Luca
http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/
www.lucadelu.org