hi,
in osgeo4w, gdal was recently updated to gdal 1.11.0
in [1] it refers to gdal 1.9.0
[...]
8 CONFIG_VERSION="1.9.0"
[...]
should this be updated to 1.11.0?
[1]
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/mswindows/osgeo4w/gdal-config
-----
best regards
Helmut
--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/osgeo4w-gdal-1-11-0-adapt-grass-trunk-mswindows-osgeo4w-gdal-config-tp5138461.html
Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Helmut Kudrnovsky <hellik@web.de> wrote:
hi,
in osgeo4w, gdal was recently updated to gdal 1.11.0
in [1] it refers to gdal 1.9.0
[...]
8 CONFIG_VERSION="1.9.0"
[...]should this be updated to 1.11.0?
Likely yes, since it appears to be updated:
http://download.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/x86/versions.html
http://download.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/x86_64/versions.html
I'm no expert of OSGeo4W though...
Markus
[1]
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/mswindows/osgeo4w/gdal-config-----
best regards
Helmut
--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/osgeo4w-gdal-1-11-0-adapt-grass-trunk-mswindows-osgeo4w-gdal-config-tp5138461.html
Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Hi,
2014-05-04 18:52 GMT+02:00 Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org>:
should this be updated to 1.11.0?
Likely yes, since it appears to be updated:
http://download.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/x86/versions.html
http://download.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/x86_64/versions.htmlI'm no expert of OSGeo4W though...
we can update it, but it has no effect on building procedure... Martin
--
Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa