Hi Javier,
the RasterNumpy class is different from other Raster classes in
pygrass, because inherit from the numpy.memmap array.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Javier Martínez-López
<javi.martinez.lopez@gmail.com> wrote:
out = pygrass.raster.RasterNumpy('eco_pa22')
In the RasterNumpy class you need to specify the raster type with
mtype when you instance the object.
and the open method should be call only after you close the map.
so a working session in the python interpreter could be:
{{{
In [1]: from grass.pygrass.raster import RasterNumpy
In [2]: new = RasterNumpy('newraster', mtype='FCELL')
In [3]: import numpy as np
In [4]: new[:] = np.random.randn(*new.shape)
In [5]: new.min()
Out[5]: RasterNumpy(-5.076531410217285, dtype=float32)
In [6]: new.max()
Out[6]: RasterNumpy(4.842053413391113, dtype=float32)
In [7]: new[:3, :4]
Out[7]:
RasterNumpy([[-0.74486554, -1.80636668, -0.62290537, 1.10075259],
[ 0.65961069, -0.71186149, 1.31982756, 0.70869118],
[ 2.11516094, -1.15944469, 0.71266735, 0.52502483]], dtype=float32)
In [8]: new.close()
}}}
Am I doing something wrong?
You should not use the open method with the RasterNumpy class when you
instantiate the object, and be careful that you have to set the name
of your raster map before to close the map or when you close the map,
see this example:
{{{
In [9]: new.open() # re-open the closed map
In [10]: new[:3, :4]
Out[10]:
RasterNumpy([[-0.74486554, -1.80636668, -0.62290537, 1.10075259],
[ 0.65961069, -0.71186149, 1.31982756, 0.70869118],
[ 2.11516094, -1.15944469, 0.71266735, 0.52502483]], dtype=float32)
In [11]: norm = (new - new.min())/(new.max() - new.min()) # do something
In [12]: norm.min()
Out[12]: RasterNumpy(0.0, dtype=float32)
In [13]: norm.max()
Out[13]: RasterNumpy(1.0, dtype=float32)
In [14]: norm.name # the name is not set
In [15]: norm.name = 'norm' # set the name
In [16]: norm.close() # then close
In [17]: norm.close('norm') # give the name and close the raster,
only from: r59192 [0]
}}}
Is there an easy way to get the raster map
out as a tiff file instead to avoid this problem?
Why not using r.out.tiff [1]?
Thank you for testing.
Pietro
[0] http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/59192
[1] http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/r.out.tiff.html