[GRASS-dev] r.slope.aspect with -n flag giving aspect of flat areas as -9998

Hi all,

I was testing r.slope.aspect with the “new” -n flag, also to include -e and -n flags in QGIS Processing, but -n flag is giving aspect values of flat areas as -9998, instead of -9999, when the precision choosed is CELL, and the output data type is CELL.

https://grass.osgeo.org/grass78/manuals/r.slope.aspect.html

I’ve tested with GRASS 7.6 (on Linux) and GRASS 7.8.2 (on Windows), both in the GUI and CLI.

(Tue Jan 28 11:19:40 2020)
r.slope.aspect -e -n --verbose elevation=SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT slope=SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS aspect=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS precision=CELL
Percent complete…
Elevation products for mapset in <SRTM_PT_25m>
Min computed aspect 0.0000, max computed aspect 360.0000
Aspect raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS> complete
Min computed slope 0.0000, max computed slope 75.2970
Slope raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS> complete
(Tue Jan 28 11:20:24 2020) Comando terminado (43 sec)

r.info map=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS@PERMANENT
±---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Map: SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS@ Date: Tue Jan 28 11:20:24 2020 |
| Mapset: PERMANENT Login of Creator: PedroVenancio |
| Location: SRTM_PT_25m |
| DataBase: D:\ICNF\Modelos_Combustivel_2018\Landscape_File\grass78 |
| Title: Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east |

Timestamp: none
Type of Map: raster Number of Categories: 360
Data Type: CELL
Rows: 23200
Columns: 11360
Total Cells: 263552000
Projection: ETRS89 / Portugal TM06
N: 278000 S: -302000 Res: 25
E: 164000 W: -120000 Res: 25
Range of data: min = -9998 max = 360
Data Source:
raster elevation file SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
Data Description:
generated by r.slope.aspect
Comments:
aspect map elev = SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
zfactor = 1.00
min_slope = 0.000000
r.slope.aspect --verbose -e -n elevation=“SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT” slo\
pe=“SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS” aspect="SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRAS\
S" format=“degrees” precision=“CELL” zscale=1.0 min_slope=0.0
±---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
(Tue Jan 28 11:26:09 2020) Comando terminado (0 sec)

Using the default precision as FCELL, all goes ok:

(Tue Jan 28 11:33:08 2020)
r.slope.aspect -e -n --verbose elevation=SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT slope=SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2 aspect=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2
Percent complete…
Elevation products for mapset in <SRTM_PT_25m>
Min computed aspect 0.0000, max computed aspect 359.8096
Aspect raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2> complete
Min computed slope 0.0000, max computed slope 75.2970
Slope raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2> complete
(Tue Jan 28 11:34:01 2020) Comando terminado (53 sec)

(Tue Jan 28 11:34:27 2020)
r.info map=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2@PERMANENT
±---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Map: SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_ Date: Tue Jan 28 11:34:01 2020 |
| Mapset: PERMANENT Login of Creator: PedroVenancio |
| Location: SRTM_PT_25m |
| DataBase: D:\ICNF\Modelos_Combustivel_2018\Landscape_File\grass78 |
| Title: Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east |

Timestamp: none
Type of Map: raster Number of Categories: 360
Data Type: FCELL
Rows: 23200
Columns: 11360
Total Cells: 263552000
Projection: ETRS89 / Portugal TM06
N: 278000 S: -302000 Res: 25
E: 164000 W: -120000 Res: 25
Range of data: min = -9999 max = 359.8097
Data Source:
raster elevation file SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
Data Description:
generated by r.slope.aspect
Comments:
aspect map elev = SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
zfactor = 1.00
min_slope = 0.000000
r.slope.aspect --verbose -e -n elevation=“SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT” slo\
pe=“SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2” aspect="SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GR\
ASS_2" format=“degrees” precision=“FCELL” zscale=1.0 min_slope=0.0
±---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
(Tue Jan 28 11:34:28 2020) Comando terminado (0 sec)

The elevation map I’m using is this one:

https://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jagoncal/srtm/SRTM_PT_25m.tif

As CELL is a 32 bit integer with a range from -2,147,483,647 to +2,147,483,647, -9999 should be fine to conform inside it.

Another issue I see is in r.info, that is showing the title as

| Title: Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east

which is not correct in this case, as the -n flag was used.

Could these be bugs?

Thank you very much.

Best regards,
Pedro Venâncio

Yes, please create an issue on github:
https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/issues/new/choose

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 6:49 AM Pedro Venâncio <pedrongvenancio@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all,

I was testing r.slope.aspect with the “new” -n flag, also to include -e and -n flags in QGIS Processing, but -n flag is giving aspect values of flat areas as -9998, instead of -9999, when the precision choosed is CELL, and the output data type is CELL.

https://grass.osgeo.org/grass78/manuals/r.slope.aspect.html

I’ve tested with GRASS 7.6 (on Linux) and GRASS 7.8.2 (on Windows), both in the GUI and CLI.

(Tue Jan 28 11:19:40 2020)
r.slope.aspect -e -n --verbose elevation=SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT slope=SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS aspect=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS precision=CELL
Percent complete…
Elevation products for mapset in <SRTM_PT_25m>
Min computed aspect 0.0000, max computed aspect 360.0000
Aspect raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS> complete
Min computed slope 0.0000, max computed slope 75.2970
Slope raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS> complete
(Tue Jan 28 11:20:24 2020) Comando terminado (43 sec)

r.info map=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS@PERMANENT
±---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Map: SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS@ Date: Tue Jan 28 11:20:24 2020 |
| Mapset: PERMANENT Login of Creator: PedroVenancio |
| Location: SRTM_PT_25m |
| DataBase: D:\ICNF\Modelos_Combustivel_2018\Landscape_File\grass78 |
| Title: Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east |

Timestamp: none
Type of Map: raster Number of Categories: 360
Data Type: CELL
Rows: 23200
Columns: 11360
Total Cells: 263552000
Projection: ETRS89 / Portugal TM06
N: 278000 S: -302000 Res: 25
E: 164000 W: -120000 Res: 25
Range of data: min = -9998 max = 360
Data Source:
raster elevation file SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
Data Description:
generated by r.slope.aspect
Comments:
aspect map elev = SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
zfactor = 1.00
min_slope = 0.000000
r.slope.aspect --verbose -e -n elevation=“SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT” slo\
pe=“SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS” aspect="SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRAS\
S" format=“degrees” precision=“CELL” zscale=1.0 min_slope=0.0
±---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
(Tue Jan 28 11:26:09 2020) Comando terminado (0 sec)

Using the default precision as FCELL, all goes ok:

(Tue Jan 28 11:33:08 2020)
r.slope.aspect -e -n --verbose elevation=SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT slope=SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2 aspect=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2
Percent complete…
Elevation products for mapset in <SRTM_PT_25m>
Min computed aspect 0.0000, max computed aspect 359.8096
Aspect raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2> complete
Min computed slope 0.0000, max computed slope 75.2970
Slope raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2> complete
(Tue Jan 28 11:34:01 2020) Comando terminado (53 sec)

(Tue Jan 28 11:34:27 2020)
r.info map=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2@PERMANENT
±---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Map: SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_ Date: Tue Jan 28 11:34:01 2020 |
| Mapset: PERMANENT Login of Creator: PedroVenancio |
| Location: SRTM_PT_25m |
| DataBase: D:\ICNF\Modelos_Combustivel_2018\Landscape_File\grass78 |
| Title: Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east |

Timestamp: none
Type of Map: raster Number of Categories: 360
Data Type: FCELL
Rows: 23200
Columns: 11360
Total Cells: 263552000
Projection: ETRS89 / Portugal TM06
N: 278000 S: -302000 Res: 25
E: 164000 W: -120000 Res: 25
Range of data: min = -9999 max = 359.8097
Data Source:
raster elevation file SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
Data Description:
generated by r.slope.aspect
Comments:
aspect map elev = SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
zfactor = 1.00
min_slope = 0.000000
r.slope.aspect --verbose -e -n elevation=“SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT” slo\
pe=“SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2” aspect="SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GR\
ASS_2" format=“degrees” precision=“FCELL” zscale=1.0 min_slope=0.0
±---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
(Tue Jan 28 11:34:28 2020) Comando terminado (0 sec)

The elevation map I’m using is this one:

https://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jagoncal/srtm/SRTM_PT_25m.tif

As CELL is a 32 bit integer with a range from -2,147,483,647 to +2,147,483,647, -9999 should be fine to conform inside it.

Another issue I see is in r.info, that is showing the title as

| Title: Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east

which is not correct in this case, as the -n flag was used.

Could these be bugs?

Thank you very much.

Best regards,
Pedro Venâncio


grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:50 PM Pedro Venâncio <pedrongvenancio@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all,

I was testing r.slope.aspect with the “new” -n flag, also to include -e and -n flags in QGIS Processing, but -n flag is giving aspect values of flat areas as -9998, instead of -9999, when the precision choosed is CELL, and the output data type is CELL.

that seems to be a rounding error, even though float or double should be able to represent -9999 exactly. Should be easy to fix.

Markus M

https://grass.osgeo.org/grass78/manuals/r.slope.aspect.html

I’ve tested with GRASS 7.6 (on Linux) and GRASS 7.8.2 (on Windows), both in the GUI and CLI.

(Tue Jan 28 11:19:40 2020)
r.slope.aspect -e -n --verbose elevation=SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT slope=SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS aspect=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS precision=CELL
Percent complete…
Elevation products for mapset in <SRTM_PT_25m>
Min computed aspect 0.0000, max computed aspect 360.0000
Aspect raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS> complete
Min computed slope 0.0000, max computed slope 75.2970
Slope raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS> complete
(Tue Jan 28 11:20:24 2020) Comando terminado (43 sec)

r.info map=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS@PERMANENT
±---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Map: SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS@ Date: Tue Jan 28 11:20:24 2020 |
| Mapset: PERMANENT Login of Creator: PedroVenancio |
| Location: SRTM_PT_25m |
| DataBase: D:\ICNF\Modelos_Combustivel_2018\Landscape_File\grass78 |
| Title: Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east |

Timestamp: none
Type of Map: raster Number of Categories: 360
Data Type: CELL
Rows: 23200
Columns: 11360
Total Cells: 263552000
Projection: ETRS89 / Portugal TM06
N: 278000 S: -302000 Res: 25
E: 164000 W: -120000 Res: 25
Range of data: min = -9998 max = 360
Data Source:
raster elevation file SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
Data Description:
generated by r.slope.aspect
Comments:
aspect map elev = SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
zfactor = 1.00
min_slope = 0.000000
r.slope.aspect --verbose -e -n elevation=“SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT” slo\
pe=“SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS” aspect="SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRAS\
S" format=“degrees” precision=“CELL” zscale=1.0 min_slope=0.0
±---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
(Tue Jan 28 11:26:09 2020) Comando terminado (0 sec)

Using the default precision as FCELL, all goes ok:

(Tue Jan 28 11:33:08 2020)
r.slope.aspect -e -n --verbose elevation=SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT slope=SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2 aspect=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2
Percent complete…
Elevation products for mapset in <SRTM_PT_25m>
Min computed aspect 0.0000, max computed aspect 359.8096
Aspect raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2> complete
Min computed slope 0.0000, max computed slope 75.2970
Slope raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2> complete
(Tue Jan 28 11:34:01 2020) Comando terminado (53 sec)

(Tue Jan 28 11:34:27 2020)
r.info map=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2@PERMANENT
±---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Map: SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_ Date: Tue Jan 28 11:34:01 2020 |
| Mapset: PERMANENT Login of Creator: PedroVenancio |
| Location: SRTM_PT_25m |
| DataBase: D:\ICNF\Modelos_Combustivel_2018\Landscape_File\grass78 |
| Title: Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east |

Timestamp: none
Type of Map: raster Number of Categories: 360
Data Type: FCELL
Rows: 23200
Columns: 11360
Total Cells: 263552000
Projection: ETRS89 / Portugal TM06
N: 278000 S: -302000 Res: 25
E: 164000 W: -120000 Res: 25
Range of data: min = -9999 max = 359.8097
Data Source:
raster elevation file SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
Data Description:
generated by r.slope.aspect
Comments:
aspect map elev = SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
zfactor = 1.00
min_slope = 0.000000
r.slope.aspect --verbose -e -n elevation=“SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT” slo\
pe=“SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2” aspect="SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GR\
ASS_2" format=“degrees” precision=“FCELL” zscale=1.0 min_slope=0.0
±---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
(Tue Jan 28 11:34:28 2020) Comando terminado (0 sec)

The elevation map I’m using is this one:
https://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jagoncal/srtm/SRTM_PT_25m.tif

As CELL is a 32 bit integer with a range from -2,147,483,647 to +2,147,483,647, -9999 should be fine to conform inside it.

Another issue I see is in r.info, that is showing the title as

| Title: Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east

which is not correct in this case, as the -n flag was used.

Could these be bugs?

Thank you very much.

Best regards,
Pedro Venâncio


grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Hi Anna and Markus,

Thank you very much!

A filled a ticket: https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/issues/319

Best regards,
Pedro

Markus Metz <markus.metz.giswork@gmail.com> escreveu no dia quinta, 30/01/2020 à(s) 08:26:

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:50 PM Pedro Venâncio <pedrongvenancio@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all,

I was testing r.slope.aspect with the “new” -n flag, also to include -e and -n flags in QGIS Processing, but -n flag is giving aspect values of flat areas as -9998, instead of -9999, when the precision choosed is CELL, and the output data type is CELL.

that seems to be a rounding error, even though float or double should be able to represent -9999 exactly. Should be easy to fix.

Markus M

https://grass.osgeo.org/grass78/manuals/r.slope.aspect.html

I’ve tested with GRASS 7.6 (on Linux) and GRASS 7.8.2 (on Windows), both in the GUI and CLI.

(Tue Jan 28 11:19:40 2020)
r.slope.aspect -e -n --verbose elevation=SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT slope=SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS aspect=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS precision=CELL
Percent complete…
Elevation products for mapset in <SRTM_PT_25m>
Min computed aspect 0.0000, max computed aspect 360.0000
Aspect raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS> complete
Min computed slope 0.0000, max computed slope 75.2970
Slope raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS> complete
(Tue Jan 28 11:20:24 2020) Comando terminado (43 sec)

r.info map=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS@PERMANENT
±---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Map: SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS@ Date: Tue Jan 28 11:20:24 2020 |
| Mapset: PERMANENT Login of Creator: PedroVenancio |
| Location: SRTM_PT_25m |
| DataBase: D:\ICNF\Modelos_Combustivel_2018\Landscape_File\grass78 |
| Title: Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east |

Timestamp: none
Type of Map: raster Number of Categories: 360
Data Type: CELL
Rows: 23200
Columns: 11360
Total Cells: 263552000
Projection: ETRS89 / Portugal TM06
N: 278000 S: -302000 Res: 25
E: 164000 W: -120000 Res: 25
Range of data: min = -9998 max = 360
Data Source:
raster elevation file SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
Data Description:
generated by r.slope.aspect
Comments:
aspect map elev = SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
zfactor = 1.00
min_slope = 0.000000
r.slope.aspect --verbose -e -n elevation=“SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT” slo\
pe=“SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS” aspect="SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRAS\
S" format=“degrees” precision=“CELL” zscale=1.0 min_slope=0.0
±---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
(Tue Jan 28 11:26:09 2020) Comando terminado (0 sec)

Using the default precision as FCELL, all goes ok:

(Tue Jan 28 11:33:08 2020)
r.slope.aspect -e -n --verbose elevation=SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT slope=SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2 aspect=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2
Percent complete…
Elevation products for mapset in <SRTM_PT_25m>
Min computed aspect 0.0000, max computed aspect 359.8096
Aspect raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2> complete
Min computed slope 0.0000, max computed slope 75.2970
Slope raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2> complete
(Tue Jan 28 11:34:01 2020) Comando terminado (53 sec)

(Tue Jan 28 11:34:27 2020)
r.info map=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2@PERMANENT
±---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Map: SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_ Date: Tue Jan 28 11:34:01 2020 |
| Mapset: PERMANENT Login of Creator: PedroVenancio |
| Location: SRTM_PT_25m |
| DataBase: D:\ICNF\Modelos_Combustivel_2018\Landscape_File\grass78 |
| Title: Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east |

Timestamp: none
Type of Map: raster Number of Categories: 360
Data Type: FCELL
Rows: 23200
Columns: 11360
Total Cells: 263552000
Projection: ETRS89 / Portugal TM06
N: 278000 S: -302000 Res: 25
E: 164000 W: -120000 Res: 25
Range of data: min = -9999 max = 359.8097
Data Source:
raster elevation file SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
Data Description:
generated by r.slope.aspect
Comments:
aspect map elev = SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT
zfactor = 1.00
min_slope = 0.000000
r.slope.aspect --verbose -e -n elevation=“SRTM_PT_25m@PERMANENT” slo\
pe=“SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2” aspect="SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GR\
ASS_2" format=“degrees” precision=“FCELL” zscale=1.0 min_slope=0.0
±---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
(Tue Jan 28 11:34:28 2020) Comando terminado (0 sec)

The elevation map I’m using is this one:
https://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jagoncal/srtm/SRTM_PT_25m.tif

As CELL is a 32 bit integer with a range from -2,147,483,647 to +2,147,483,647, -9999 should be fine to conform inside it.

Another issue I see is in r.info, that is showing the title as

| Title: Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east

which is not correct in this case, as the -n flag was used.

Could these be bugs?

Thank you very much.

Best regards,
Pedro Venâncio


grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Pedro Venâncio
<pedrongvenancio@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Anna and Markus,

Thank you very much!

A filled a ticket: https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/issues/319

It was fixed in master f449ea5 and relbr78 fdd079c by Markus M.

Please test and update/close the issue.

Best
markusN

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 9:35 PM Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Pedro Venâncio
<pedrongvenancio@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Anna and Markus,

Thank you very much!

A filled a ticket: https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/issues/319

It was fixed in master f449ea5 and relbr78 fdd079c by Markus M.

Please test and update/close the issue.

there is a new PR #320 by Anna (https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/320) fixing also the title and the color table. Please test!

Markus M

Best
markusN

Hi Markus and Anna,

It’s fixed now! Thank you very much!

The #320 part will be fixed after the merge.

-e and -n flags are now used also in QGIS Processing Framework: qgis/QGIS#34087

Best regards,

Pedro

Markus Metz <markus.metz.giswork@gmail.com> escreveu no dia sábado, 1/02/2020 à(s) 22:10:

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 9:35 PM Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Pedro Venâncio
<pedrongvenancio@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Anna and Markus,

Thank you very much!

A filled a ticket: https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/issues/319

It was fixed in master f449ea5 and relbr78 fdd079c by Markus M.

Please test and update/close the issue.

there is a new PR #320 by Anna (https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/320) fixing also the title and the color table. Please test!

Markus M

Best
markusN