is it really a good idea for us to be telling people to use "rm -rf"
in a main help page?? For one thing it's not portable, and for another
new users are reading that- I'd suggest for them to learn to do dangerous
things on their own time and we just say nothing. They'll all know how
to delete a folder, all we have to say is that they can do that without
worrying about breaking some registry. but let them source their own ammo.
fine for grass7, but please don't disable valid+working functionality in
devbr6. if you want to launch a gui window for it use "r.recode --ui".
well, I prefer to disable GRASS_UI_TERM in general (where is
possible). But maybe you are right (in terms of g6.x), if you prefer I
will revert this change.
> re. https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/34366
>
> fine for grass7, but please don't disable
valid+working functionality in
> devbr6. if you want to launch a gui window for it use
"r.recode --ui".
Martin:
well, I prefer to disable GRASS_UI_TERM in general (where is possible).
it's added there, by hand, on purpose & for a reason. without it there
is no (obvious) way to get at that part of the module's functionality.
sure, the gui menu should use --ui in the menu entry for that module so
that a xterm isn't needed and there are not wingrass problems etc.
But maybe you are right (in terms of g6.x), if you prefer I will revert
this change.
for g6.x I prefer that it be reverted so the interactive functionality
is not (effectively) lost.