Michael,
2008/1/17, Michael Barton <michael.barton@asu.edu>:
Shouldn't this be changed? I thought that the wxpython files were
going to move into the 6.3 branch with the move to the SVN and not
wait until 6.4. This will allow more people to actively test and
improve the new GUI.
The files may be *copied* from trunk to releasebranch_6_3 before 6.3.0
will be released (in 2 weeks). For wxGUI development should be used
trunk (or devel grass6 branch after it will be created, not
releasebranch_6_3). I am not sure about copying files from trunk to
releasebranch_6_3, since it would be nice to avoid backporting
issue...
Martin
Michael
______________________________
Michael Barton, Professor
Professor of Anthropology
Director of Graduate Studies
School of Human Diversity & Social Change
Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ 85287-2402
USAvoice: 480-965-6262; fax: 480-965-7671
www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbartonOn Jan 16, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Moritz Lennert wrote:
> On Thu, January 17, 2008 00:28, Michael Barton wrote:
>> Nikos,
>>
>> These are in the trunk. I'm not sure why they are not in 6.3.0RC4.
>
> As Martin mentioned, the 6.3 branch contains outdated files. See
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/releasebranch_6_3/gui/wxpython
> which do not lead to the installation of wxgrass.
>
> Moritz
>_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
--
Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa *