[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS-user] problems with v.report

Maciej Sieczka wrote:

dziadgba dziadgba wrote:

hy everybody, I am working on a project involving geografical data.
I used grass61 until the end of june, now I reinstalled my system
and but grass62.

The problem is that when I try to use v.report on a layer containing
points.

v.report map=roadmapCleanedAndSplit layer=1 option=coor

strangely the list I get includes only the x coordinate, y coodinate
is missing.

output: cat|type|name|active|line|segment|x|y
16021||||||681109.126691232 16022||||||678959.20221614

I confirm the bug in GRASS 6.3 CVS. Please report it to the tracker.
Maybe someone will take care of it.

I did :). Submitted to 6.3 CVS. Also attached to this email - please test.

I'd like to backport it to 6.2 if nobody minds.

Maciek

(attachments)

v.report (4.98 KB)

Maciej Sieczka wrote:

Maciej Sieczka wrote:

dziadgba dziadgba wrote:

hy everybody, I am working on a project involving geografical data.
I used grass61 until the end of june, now I reinstalled my system
and but grass62.

The problem is that when I try to use v.report on a layer containing
points.

v.report map=roadmapCleanedAndSplit layer=1 option=coor

strangely the list I get includes only the x coordinate, y coodinate
is missing.

output: cat|type|name|active|line|segment|x|y
16021||||||681109.126691232 16022||||||678959.20221614

I confirm the bug in GRASS 6.3 CVS. Please report it to the tracker.
Maybe someone will take care of it.

I did :). Submitted to 6.3 CVS. Also attached to this email - please test.

I'd like to backport it to 6.2 if nobody minds.

Maciek,

looks good to me! For the 6.2 backport, please keep in mind that
g.message doesn't exist - so a minimized patch is needed there.

Markus

--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--GRASS-user--problems-with-v.report-tf4409393.html#a12581423
Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Markus Neteler wrote:

Maciej Sieczka wrote:

I'd like to backport it to 6.2 if nobody minds.

looks good to me! For the 6.2 backport, please keep in mind that
g.message doesn't exist - so a minimized patch is needed there.

Will do soon. Thanks for the tip. I'm pretty sure I'd forget about the
g.message otherwise.

Maciek

Maciej Sieczka wrote:

Maciej Sieczka wrote:

I'd like to backport it to 6.2 if nobody minds.

Done.

Maciek