Hi,
FYI
maybe interesting for us as well (except for the cmake part) for winGRASS…
Markus
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: “Howard Butler” <howard@hobu.co>
Date: Jul 5, 2015 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Proj] AppVeyor (Windows CI) setup + Windows CMake question
To: “PROJ.4 and general Projections Discussions” <proj@lists.maptools.org>
Cc:
On Jul 4, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Even Rouault <even.rouault@spatialys.com> wrote:
Hi,
Similarly to Linux Travis-CI builds, I’ve also added the configuration for the
AppVeyor hosted CI service for Windows builds
:https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.4/blob/master/appveyor.ymlThe following configurations are tested (for pushes and pull requests) :
Environment: BUILD_TYPE=cmake, VS_VERSION=Visual Studio 10; Platform: x64
Environment: BUILD_TYPE=cmake, VS_VERSION=Visual Studio 10; Platform: x86
Environment: BUILD_TYPE=cmake, VS_VERSION=Visual Studio 11; Platform: x64
Environment: BUILD_TYPE=cmake, VS_VERSION=Visual Studio 11; Platform: x86
Environment: BUILD_TYPE=cmake, VS_VERSION=Visual Studio 12; Platform: x64
Environment: BUILD_TYPE=cmake, VS_VERSION=Visual Studio 12; Platform: x86
Environment: BUILD_TYPE=nmake; Platform: x64
Environment: BUILD_TYPE=nmake; Platform: x86Thanks! So many warnings! [1].
PDAL uses AppVeyor for its windows builds too and we’ve been very happy with it. I paid for the basic account which does make things run quite a bit faster than otherwise would be expected for the OSS variant. Maybe we could convince OSGeo to pay for such infrastructure.
[1] https://ci.appveyor.com/project/OSGeo/proj-4/build/job/2j2mt8kllv8klqx4
… (proj4 cmake stuff deleted) …
Proj mailing list
Proj@lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj