Le 17 avril 2017 20:22:35 GMT+02:00, Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com> a écrit :
Hi all,
based on roadmap published in ML [1] we could go out with RC2. There
are no
blockers registered [2], so it is seems that we can slowly start
preparing RC2.
+1
Moritz
Ma
[1]
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2017-February/084328.html
[2]
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&priority=blocker&priority=critical&milestone=7.2.1&milestone=7.2.0&group=type&order=priority
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
On Apr 18, 2017 3:20 PM, “Moritz Lennert” <mlennert@club.worldonline.be> wrote:
Le 17 avril 2017 20:22:35 GMT+02:00, Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com> a écrit :
Hi all,
based on roadmap published in ML [1] we could go out with RC2. There
are no
blockers registered [2], so it is seems that we can slowly start
preparing RC2.
+1
While generally yes, we still lack the po files update from transifex…
Markus
[1]
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2017-February/084328.html
[2]
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&priority=blocker&priority=critical&milestone=7.2.1&milestone=7.2.0&group=type&order=priority
On 20 April 2017 at 19:12, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:
While generally yes, we still lack the po files update from transifex...
The problem right now is the Portuguese translations files, mods an
libs po file return a lot of "invalid multibyte sequence"
You can try your self following the wiki instructions [0] (they were
there also during your visit 
)
[0] https://grasswiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GRASS_messages_translation#Get_the_translated_po_files
Markus
--
ciao
Luca
www.lucadelu.org
On 22 April 2017 at 09:13, Luca Delucchi <lucadeluge@gmail.com> wrote:
On 20 April 2017 at 19:12, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:
While generally yes, we still lack the po files update from transifex...
The problem right now is the Portuguese translations files, mods an
libs po file return a lot of "invalid multibyte sequence"
There is another problem, all the fuzzy strings had lost during the
import, you can read more here
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/transifex-updates/zICBvn-823o
So probably before merge we should decide what to do, I suggest a
translation sprint...
--
ciao
Luca
www.lucadelu.org
Hi,
2017-04-22 9:34 GMT+02:00 Luca Delucchi <lucadeluge@gmail.com>:
There is another problem, all the fuzzy strings had lost during the
import, you can read more here
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/transifex-updates/zICBvn-823o
So probably before merge we should decide what to do, I suggest a
translation sprint...
is it blocker for 7.2.1 release? In any case RC2 can be released
regardless of this issue, right? Ma
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Luca Delucchi <lucadeluge@gmail.com> wrote:
On 20 April 2017 at 19:12, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:
While generally yes, we still lack the po files update from transifex...
The problem right now is the Portuguese translations files, mods an
libs po file return a lot of "invalid multibyte sequence"
Fixed. The file simply needed to be converted to UTF-8 from ISO-8859-1
using iconv + editing of the header:
for i in `ls grass*_pt.po ` ; do iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 $i >
dd.tmp ; \mv dd.tmp $i ; done
... then edit all three files for the header update of encoding.
No more "invalid multibyte sequence" errors.
Perhaps we should convert all .po files to UTF-8? This is not yet the case.
Additional observations:
- the transifex_merge.sh deletes all headers along with the translation authors
- it empties all "fuzzy" state messages.
Due to that I didn't merge yet the updated translations. I try to
understand where the header replacement with the generic gettext
header happens.
Markus
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Luca Delucchi <lucadeluge@gmail.com> wrote:
On 20 April 2017 at 19:12, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:
While generally yes, we still lack the po files update from transifex...
The problem right now is the Portuguese translations files, mods an
libs po file return a lot of "invalid multibyte sequence"
Fixed. The file simply needed to be converted to UTF-8 from ISO-8859-1
using iconv + editing of the header:
[...]
Perhaps we should convert all .po files to UTF-8? This is not yet the case.
Done, both in trunk and relbranch72.
Additional observations:
- the transifex_merge.sh deletes all headers along with the translation authors
Fixed: I have implemented extra code in grass-addons/tools/transifex_merge.sh
- it empties all "fuzzy" state messages.
This discussion is from 2011:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/transifex-updates/zICBvn-823o
perhaps it became this:
https://docs.transifex.com/setup/translation-memory
However, I'll prepare RC2 now.
Markus
--
Markus Neteler, PhD
http://www.mundialis.de - free data with free software
http://grass.osgeo.org
http://courses.neteler.org/blog
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
based on roadmap published in ML [1] we could go out with RC2. There are no
blockers registered [2], so it is seems that we can slowly start
preparing RC2. Any objections?
GRASS GIS 7.2.1RC2 is out:
https://grass.osgeo.org/grass72/source/
Binary packages to be prepared... hoping that this is the last RC,
let's also draft the release notes:
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Release/7.2.1-News
Markus
[1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2017-February/084328.html
[2] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&priority=blocker&priority=critical&milestone=7.2.1&milestone=7.2.0&group=type&order=priority
On 04/22/2017 07:49 PM, Markus Neteler wrote:
GRASS GIS 7.2.1RC2 is out:
https://grass.osgeo.org/grass72/source/
Should the demolocation include a .bash_history & .bashrc?
It seems to be leaking your (neteler) environment.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 7:49 PM, Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:
GRASS GIS 7.2.1RC2 is out:
https://grass.osgeo.org/grass72/source/
Binary packages to be prepared... hoping that this is the last RC,
let's also draft the release notes:
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Release/7.2.1-News
Fedora + EPEL7 binary RPMs:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/neteler/grass72
EPEL 6 binary RPMs:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/neteler/grass72_epel6
cheers,
Markus
--
Markus Neteler, PhD
http://www.mundialis.de - free data with free software
http://grass.osgeo.org
http://courses.neteler.org/blog
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
<sebastic@xs4all.nl> wrote:
On 04/22/2017 07:49 PM, Markus Neteler wrote:
GRASS GIS 7.2.1RC2 is out:
https://grass.osgeo.org/grass72/source/
Should the demolocation include a .bash_history & .bashrc?
It seems to be leaking your (neteler) environment.
Good catch, removed from tarball.
Markus
Hi,
2017-04-22 19:49 GMT+02:00 Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org>:
based on roadmap published in ML [1] we could go out with RC2. There are no
blockers registered [2], so it is seems that we can slowly start
preparing RC2. Any objections?
GRASS GIS 7.2.1RC2 is out:
https://grass.osgeo.org/grass72/source/
winGRASS packages available for testing:
* native [1]
* OSGeo4W testing (exp) area
Ma
[1] https://grass.osgeo.org/grass72/binary/mswindows/native/
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
On 04/23/2017 04:17 PM, Martin Landa wrote:
2017-04-23 11:11 GMT+02:00 Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com>:
GRASS GIS 7.2.1RC2 is out:
https://grass.osgeo.org/grass72/source/
also Ubuntu packages (trusty, xenial, zesty) available for testing
from UbuntuGIS Expr PPA [1].
Please note that zesty is not an LTS release, and won't be supported by
UbuntuGIS. None of the other packages will be available for it.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Hi,
2017-04-23 16:17 GMT+02:00 Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com>:
also Ubuntu packages (trusty, xenial, zesty) available for testing
from UbuntuGIS Expr PPA [1].
update: UbuntuGIS should maintain only packages for LTS Ubuntu
releases. So you will find in Expr/Unstable PPA GRASS packages only
for trusty and xenial. For other Ubuntu releases will be used our
GRASS Stable PPA repo [1]. I changed website accordingly [2]. Ma
[1] https://launchpad.net/~grass/+archive/ubuntu/grass-stable
[2] https://grass.osgeo.org/download/software/linux/
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa