A lot of tests are failing:
http://fatra.cnr.ncsu.edu/grassgistests/reports_for_date-2016-05-02-07-00/report_for_nc_basic_spm_grass7_nc/testfiles.html
http://fatra.cnr.ncsu.edu/grassgistests/reports_for_date-2016-05-03-07-00/report_for_nc_basic_spm_grass7_nc/testfiles.html
Seems like PyGRASS related marameter checking:
The Parameter require a string, <type ‘unicode’> instead is provided
For example:
ERROR: test_1 (main.TestUnregister)
Perform several unregistration operations
…
ValueError: The Parameter require a string, <type ‘unicode’> instead is provided: u’mapset = “__temporal_t_unregister_test_unregister” AND (name = “a1” OR name = “a2” OR name = “a3”)’
The change should be somewhere here:
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/log/grass/trunk?rev=68369&stop_rev=68347
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus@gmail.com> wrote:
A lot of tests are failing:
http://fatra.cnr.ncsu.edu/grassgistests/reports_for_date-2016-05-02-07-00/report_for_nc_basic_spm_grass7_nc/testfiles.html
http://fatra.cnr.ncsu.edu/grassgistests/reports_for_date-2016-05-03-07-00/report_for_nc_basic_spm_grass7_nc/testfiles.html
Seems like PyGRASS related marameter checking:
The Parameter <where> require a string, <type 'unicode'> instead is provided
For example:
ERROR: test_1 (__main__.TestUnregister)
Perform several unregistration operations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
...
ValueError: The Parameter <where> require a string, <type 'unicode'> instead
is provided: u'mapset = "__temporal_t_unregister_test_unregister" AND (name
= "a1" OR name = "a2" OR name = "a3")'
The change should be somewhere here:
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/log/grass/trunk?rev=68369&stop_rev=68347
/me guessing
Could it be this change?
Author: hcho
Date: 2016-03-15 01:56:28 -0700 (Tue, 15 Mar 2016)
New Revision: 68061
Modified:
grass/trunk/lib/gis/parser.c
Log:
G_recreate_command: Add empty answers.
Fix the command history for e.g., v.edit where="". Without this fix,
where="" is not included, which makes an invalid command.
which looks like a valid improvement to me. If it is this one, perhaps
the tests need some update?
Markus