Dear All,
I'm trying to cleanup i.rectify manual. I don't see any difference
between -a (Rectify all images in group) set and not set - in either
case all raster maps in the group are rectified. Is this a bug or am I
missing something?
Would it hurt if I chenged the module's options descriptions to comply
with GRASS lingo (eg. "raster map" instead of "file" etc.).
Best
Maciek
--
Maciej Sieczka
www.sieczka.org
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Maciej Sieczka <tutey@o2.pl> wrote:
Dear All,
I'm trying to cleanup i.rectify manual. I don't see any difference
between -a (Rectify all images in group) set and not set - in either
case all raster maps in the group are rectified. Is this a bug or am I
missing something?
Not sure... in the code there is :
ifile = G_define_standard_option(G_OPT_R_INPUT);
ifile->required = NO;
...
if (!ifile->answers)
a->answer = 1; /* force all */
/* Find out how files on command line */
if (!a->answer) {
for (m = 0; ifile->answers[m]; m++) {
k = m;
}
k++;
}
Would it hurt if I chenged the module's options descriptions to comply
with GRASS lingo (eg. "raster map" instead of "file" etc.).
In both 6.4.svn and trunk it is now:
i.rectify [-ca] [input=name] extension=string order=value [--verbose]
Standardization we should do in GRASS 7
http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/GRASS_7_ideas_collection#Parameters_standardization
Markus
Markus Neteler pisze:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Maciej Sieczka <tutey@o2.pl> wrote:
Would it hurt if I chenged the module's options descriptions to
comply with GRASS lingo (eg. "raster map" instead of "file" etc.).
In both 6.4.svn and trunk it is now: i.rectify [-ca] [input=name]
extension=string order=value [--verbose]
Standardization we should do in GRASS 7 http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/GRASS_7_ideas_collection#Parameters_standardization
I do not mean to change *options names* of course! I was going to change
their *descriptions*, eg.:
1. "Name of the imagery group" -> "Input imagery group name" (to make it
clear i's the input)
2. "Output file extension" -> "Output raster maps extension" (term
"file" is ambigious in GRASS).
Is this acceptable?
--
Maciej Sieczka
www.sieczka.org
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Maciej Sieczka <tutey@o2.pl> wrote:
Markus Neteler pisze:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Maciej Sieczka <tutey@o2.pl> wrote:
I was going to change their *descriptions*, eg.:
1. "Name of the imagery group" -> "Input imagery group name" (to make it
clear i's the input)
2. "Output file extension" -> "Output raster maps extension" (term
"file" is ambigious in GRASS).
Is this acceptable?
Sorry, I made a mess in my previous commit. Now it is:
i.rectify [-ca] group=name [input=name[,name,...]] extension=string
...
Parameters:
group Name of input imagery group
input Name of input raster map(s)
extension Output file extension (inputfile(s) + extension)
order Rectification polynom order (1-3)
So the first is already solved, the second, yes, should be fixed
in the C code.
Markus
Markus Neteler pisze:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Maciej Sieczka <tutey@o2.pl> wrote:
I'm trying to cleanup i.rectify manual. I don't see any difference
between -a (Rectify all images in group) set and not set - in either
case all raster maps in the group are rectified. Is this a bug or am I
missing something?
Not sure... in the code there is :
ifile = G_define_standard_option(G_OPT_R_INPUT);
ifile->required = NO;
...
if (!ifile->answers)
a->answer = 1; /* force all */
/* Find out how files on command line */
if (!a->answer) {
for (m = 0; ifile->answers[m]; m++) {
k = m;
}
k++;
}
Getting back to this - anybody knows what's the difference between -a set and not set?
Maciek
--
Maciej Sieczka
www.sieczka.org