Attached is a graphic showing the elevation input and direction output.
If you look near the burgundy square in the elevation at the 4.0 value to the NW, *everything* near that cell should flow into it (all neighbors are >4.0). However, if you look at the direction output, the 4.8 value (south of 4.0 and west of the burgundy 4.4) flows to the NE out of the domain (direction = -1). This seems like a bug.
Viewing the output direction raster, the burgundy "3" flows into the "-2" to the NW. That means that is ONE catchment. But it is bisected by a different catchment (the -1 flowing out of the domain).
On 2018-11-19 at 08:26 +0100, Ken Mankoff <mankoff@gmail.com> wrote:
Attached is a graphic showing the elevation input and direction
output.
If you look near the burgundy square in the elevation at the 4.0 value
to the NW, *everything* near that cell should flow into it (all
neighbors are >4.0). However, if you look at the direction output, the
4.8 value (south of 4.0 and west of the burgundy 4.4) flows to the NE
out of the domain (direction = -1). This seems like a bug.
Viewing the output direction raster, the burgundy "3" flows into the
"-2" to the NW. That means that is ONE catchment. But it is bisected
by a different catchment (the -1 flowing out of the domain).
Well I can't re-create this with an MWE so for now please disregard this issue for now. I've lost the location in the large raster where I observed this, so I can't look into what caused the bug until it is re-created.
