Just built the latest release from 7.7.svn (I think it's 73396) and when I
run 'd.mon start=wx0' I see a vertical rectangle with a blue border in the
center (see attached screenshot.png). d.erase does nothing to it and trying
to print it as content fails; there's nothing to print.
Any ideas on where this originates and how to remove it?
Rich
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, Rich Shepard wrote:
Just built the latest release from 7.7.svn (I think it's 73396) and when I
run 'd.mon start=wx0' I see a vertical rectangle with a blue border in the
center (see attached screenshot.png). d.erase does nothing to it and
trying to print it as content fails; there's nothing to print.
Just for grins, I started grass7.7.svn with the GUI. Now the blue-bordered
rectangle fills the map display window top-to-bottom and almost completely
side-to-side.
Rich
That’s the computational region limits which are now visible by default in Map display and wx monitors.
However, I agree that an option to make it invisible as before would make sense.
You can open a ticket for this
Vero
El mar., 25 sep. 2018 14:24, Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com> escribió:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, Rich Shepard wrote:
Just built the latest release from 7.7.svn (I think it’s 73396) and when I
run ‘d.mon start=wx0’ I see a vertical rectangle with a blue border in the
center (see attached screenshot.png). d.erase does nothing to it and
trying to print it as content fails; there’s nothing to print.Just for grins, I started grass7.7.svn with the GUI. Now the blue-bordered
rectangle fills the map display window top-to-bottom and almost completely
side-to-side.Rich
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:28 PM Veronica Andreo <veroandreo@gmail.com> wrote:
That’s the computational region limits which are now visible by default in Map display and wx monitors.
However, I agree that an option to make it invisible as before would make sense.
Just disable it at left bottom of the display window → the trick is that you need to first switch to “Show comp. extent” which isn’t obvious:
You can open a ticket for this
Not needed 
But I think that the “Show computational extent” should always be there. Maybe a ticket for that wish?
Markus
PS: sorry for HTML email
El mar., 25 sept. 2018 a las 22:32, Markus Neteler (<neteler@osgeo.org>) escribió:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:28 PM Veronica Andreo <veroandreo@gmail.com> wrote:
That’s the computational region limits which are now visible by default in Map display and wx monitors.
However, I agree that an option to make it invisible as before would make sense.Just disable it at left bottom of the display window → the trick is that you need to first switch to “Show comp. extent” which isn’t obvious:
I completely missed that one! This is actually the very first time I inspect that dropdown menu… ops
You can open a ticket for this
Not needed
But I think that the “Show computational extent” should always be there. Maybe a ticket for that wish?
Markus
PS: sorry for HTML email
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, Markus Neteler wrote:
Just disable it at left bottom of the display window -> the trick is that
you need to *first* switch to "Show comp. extent" which isn't obvious:
Well, that is certainly well hidden.
But I think that the "Show computational extent" should always be there.
Maybe a ticket for that wish?
+1!
Rich
This is a great feature, but I was wondering why it turns red on zoom in/out.
That’s the computational region limits which are now visible by default in Map display and wx monitors.
However, I agree that an option to make it invisible as before would make sense.Just disable it at left bottom of the display window → the trick is that you need to first switch to “Show comp. extent” which isn’t obvious:
You can open a ticket for this
Not needed
But I think that the “Show computational extent” should always be there. Maybe a ticket for that wish?
+1
Huidae Cho, Ph.D., PE, M.ASCE, CFM, GISP
Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 1:50 PM Huidae Cho <grass4u@gmail.com> wrote:
This is a great feature, but I was wondering why it turns red on zoom in/out.
I think it changes color depending if you are zoomed inside or outside of the region. I find this behavior little bit confusing, perhaps just having one color would be enough, and maybe don’t show it when you are zoomed inside?
Anna
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:32 PM Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:28 PM Veronica Andreo <veroandreo@gmail.com> wrote:
That’s the computational region limits which are now visible by default in Map display and wx monitors.
However, I agree that an option to make it invisible as before would make sense.Just disable it at left bottom of the display window → the trick is that you need to first switch to “Show comp. extent” which isn’t obvious:
You can open a ticket for this
Not needed
But I think that the “Show computational extent” should always be there. Maybe a ticket for that wish?
+1
Markus
PS: sorry for HTML email
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user–
Huidae Cho, Ph.D., PE, M.ASCE, CFM, GISP
Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Ok, so blue means the current display is the full computational region (OK). Red means the current display is a subset of the region (zoomed in, OK). What about when you zoom out and the display contains and is bigger than the computational region? It is still red. Not blue even if you are seeing the full region. The last case confuses me. When is it red or blue?
Thanks,
Huidae
–
Huidae Cho, Ph.D., P.E. (MD), M.ASCE, CFM, GISP
https://idea.isnew.info
Sent from my phone
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 2:27 PM Anna Petrášová <kratochanna@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 1:50 PM Huidae Cho <grass4u@gmail.com> wrote:
This is a great feature, but I was wondering why it turns red on zoom in/out.
I think it changes color depending if you are zoomed inside or outside of the region. I find this behavior little bit confusing, perhaps just having one color would be enough, and maybe don’t show it when you are zoomed inside?
Anna
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:32 PM Markus Neteler <neteler@osgeo.org> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:28 PM Veronica Andreo <veroandreo@gmail.com> wrote:
That’s the computational region limits which are now visible by default in Map display and wx monitors.
However, I agree that an option to make it invisible as before would make sense.Just disable it at left bottom of the display window → the trick is that you need to first switch to “Show comp. extent” which isn’t obvious:
You can open a ticket for this
Not needed
But I think that the “Show computational extent” should always be there. Maybe a ticket for that wish?
+1
Markus
PS: sorry for HTML email
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user–
Huidae Cho, Ph.D., PE, M.ASCE, CFM, GISP
Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Hi,
st 26. 9. 2018 v 20:27 odesílatel Anna Petrášová <kratochanna@gmail.com> napsal:
I think it changes color depending if you are zoomed inside or outside of the region. I find this behavior little bit confusing, perhaps just having one color would be enough, and maybe don't show it when you are zoomed inside?
in r73826 the settings was changed to show comp. region extent in red
color only regardless display and computation extent position. If no
objection I will do backport to g76 release branch in next days.
Question is whether comp. region extent should be displayed by
default. The behaviour has been changed accordingly [1], but
unfortunately there was no feedback. Any opinion (since it affects
7.6.0 release)?
Ma
[1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3519
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
On 24/12/2018 14:01, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi, st 26. 9. 2018 v 20:27 odesílatel Anna Petrášová [<kratochanna@gmail.com>](mailto:kratochanna@gmail.com) napsal:I think it changes color depending if you are zoomed inside or outside of the region. I find this behavior little bit confusing, perhaps just having one color would be enough, and maybe don't show it when you are zoomed inside?in r73826 the settings was changed to show comp. region extent in red color only regardless display and computation extent position. If no objection I will do backport to g76 release branch in next days. Question is whether comp. region extent should be displayed by default. The behaviour has been changed accordingly [1], but unfortunately there was no feedback. Any opinion (since it affects 7.6.0 release)?
I’d like to see the region displayed by default. Usually the first thing I do is show the computational region in the map display. It’s such a fundamental part of how GRASS works…
Ma [1] [https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3519](https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3519)
--
Micha Silver
Ben Gurion Univ.
Sde Boker, Remote Sensing Lab
+972-523-665918
On Mon, 24 Dec 2018, Micha Silver wrote:
I'd like to see the region displayed by default. Usually the first thing I
do is show the computational region in the map display. It's such a
fundamental part of how GRASS works...
+1
Rich
So how does it work now in one color?
display == full comp region: red box
display > and contains full comp region: red box smaller than display
display < and inside full comp region: no box at all? (can be confusing with cases 4 & 5) or red box (can be confusing with case 1). I think we need two colors in this case? Actual comp region borders red, Display borders within comp region blue (maybe, switching blue and red would be better?). For example, completely inside (not crossing any comp region boundaries) blue box. Looking at the east comp region boundary: vertical line in red, top-left, bottom-left, and left in blue. Again, I think if we use red and blue, it would be better to use blue for comp region borders and red for partially/contained borders.
display > and does not contain full comp region: no box
display < and outside full comp region: no box
Huidae
Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, PE (MD), CFM, M.ASCE
Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team
Maybe, this figure is easier to understand. blue for comp region and red for partial version.
Black: display
Blue: full comp region
Red: partial intersection of display and full comp region
In this color scheme, it’s very clear what we’re looking at in the display.
Huidae
Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, PE (MD), CFM, M.ASCE
Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team
Hi all,
+1 for showing computational region by default! It is a super handy feature
Regarding the different colors, I do not have a very strong opinion. I was already used to blue for full region extent coincident with display and red when display is different from region extent.
Case 3b proposed, IIUC, would mean that display will have incomplete lines and that seems more confusing in my view. I would suggest that (if implemented like this) 3b is shown as 3a.
my2cents
Vero
El lun., 24 dic. 2018 a las 15:30, Huidae Cho (<grass4u@gmail.com>) escribió:
Maybe, this figure is easier to understand. blue for comp region and red for partial version.
Black: display
Blue: full comp region
Red: partial intersection of display and full comp regionIn this color scheme, it’s very clear what we’re looking at in the display.
Huidae
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 9:06 AM Huidae Cho <grass4u@gmail.com> wrote:
So how does it work now in one color?
display == full comp region: red box
display > and contains full comp region: red box smaller than display
display < and inside full comp region: no box at all? (can be confusing with cases 4 & 5) or red box (can be confusing with case 1). I think we need two colors in this case? Actual comp region borders red, Display borders within comp region blue (maybe, switching blue and red would be better?). For example, completely inside (not crossing any comp region boundaries) blue box. Looking at the east comp region boundary: vertical line in red, top-left, bottom-left, and left in blue. Again, I think if we use red and blue, it would be better to use blue for comp region borders and red for partially/contained borders.
display > and does not contain full comp region: no box
display < and outside full comp region: no box
Huidae
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 7:02 AM Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
st 26. 9. 2018 v 20:27 odesílatel Anna Petrášová <kratochanna@gmail.com> napsal:
I think it changes color depending if you are zoomed inside or outside of the region. I find this behavior little bit confusing, perhaps just having one color would be enough, and maybe don’t show it when you are zoomed inside?
in r73826 the settings was changed to show comp. region extent in red
color only regardless display and computation extent position. If no
objection I will do backport to g76 release branch in next days.
Question is whether comp. region extent should be displayed by
default. The behaviour has been changed accordingly [1], but
unfortunately there was no feedback. Any opinion (since it affects
7.6.0 release)?Ma
[1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3519
–
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa–
Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, PE (MD), CFM, M.ASCE
Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team–
Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, PE (MD), CFM, M.ASCE
Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Hello Vero,
Actually, 3b has a complete rectangle (NW in red, SE in blue).
Regards,
Huidae
Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, PE (MD), CFM, M.ASCE
Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team
Hi Huidae,
El jue., 27 dic. 2018 22:17, Huidae Cho <grass4u@gmail.com> escribió:
Hello Vero,
Actually, 3b has a complete rectangle (NW in red, SE in blue)
Right
I overlooked the blue part. Still, IMHO, case 3b it’s confusing.
Best,
Vero
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 7:24 PM Veronica Andreo <veroandreo@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
+1 for showing computational region by default! It is a super handy feature
Regarding the different colors, I do not have a very strong opinion. I was already used to blue for full region extent coincident with display and red when display is different from region extent.
Case 3b proposed, IIUC, would mean that display will have incomplete lines and that seems more confusing in my view. I would suggest that (if implemented like this) 3b is shown as 3a.
my2cents
VeroEl lun., 24 dic. 2018 a las 15:30, Huidae Cho (<grass4u@gmail.com>) escribió:
Maybe, this figure is easier to understand. blue for comp region and red for partial version.
Black: display
Blue: full comp region
Red: partial intersection of display and full comp regionIn this color scheme, it’s very clear what we’re looking at in the display.
Huidae
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 9:06 AM Huidae Cho <grass4u@gmail.com> wrote:
So how does it work now in one color?
display == full comp region: red box
display > and contains full comp region: red box smaller than display
display < and inside full comp region: no box at all? (can be confusing with cases 4 & 5) or red box (can be confusing with case 1). I think we need two colors in this case? Actual comp region borders red, Display borders within comp region blue (maybe, switching blue and red would be better?). For example, completely inside (not crossing any comp region boundaries) blue box. Looking at the east comp region boundary: vertical line in red, top-left, bottom-left, and left in blue. Again, I think if we use red and blue, it would be better to use blue for comp region borders and red for partially/contained borders.
display > and does not contain full comp region: no box
display < and outside full comp region: no box
Huidae
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 7:02 AM Martin Landa <landa.martin@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
st 26. 9. 2018 v 20:27 odesílatel Anna Petrášová <kratochanna@gmail.com> napsal:
I think it changes color depending if you are zoomed inside or outside of the region. I find this behavior little bit confusing, perhaps just having one color would be enough, and maybe don’t show it when you are zoomed inside?
in r73826 the settings was changed to show comp. region extent in red
color only regardless display and computation extent position. If no
objection I will do backport to g76 release branch in next days.
Question is whether comp. region extent should be displayed by
default. The behaviour has been changed accordingly [1], but
unfortunately there was no feedback. Any opinion (since it affects
7.6.0 release)?Ma
[1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3519
–
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa–
Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, PE (MD), CFM, M.ASCE
Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team–
Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, PE (MD), CFM, M.ASCE
Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user–
Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, PE (MD), CFM, M.ASCE
Open Source GIS Developer, GRASS GIS Development Team