Advanced users,
may I seek for some recommendation on filtering Landsat reflectance outliers?
I have many Landsat scenes pre-processed (DN to Radiance/Reflectance, Cloud-
masked, Topo-Corrected, band-wise patched in large maps over Greece) and ready
for further explorations.
Applying "color=grey -e OR color=grey1.0 -e" doesn't work well for all larger
maps (after patching -- call it mosaicking if you prefer). That is, some maps
appear too dark (i.e. band 3).
I guess that this may be due to abnormally (?) high reflectance values. I
guess those are artefacts, or not?
The univariate stats of 1+6 bands look fine to me, e.g.:
mean: 298.591
mean of absolute values: 298.591 ### this is Temperature in K
mean: 0.0453416
mean of absolute values: 0.0453416
mean: 0.0490654
mean of absolute values: 0.0490654
mean: 0.0785879
mean of absolute values: 0.0785879
mean: 0.139015
mean of absolute values: 0.139015
mean: 0.121867
mean of absolute values: 0.121867
mean: 0.0845493
mean of absolute values: 0.0845493
Yet, the max Top-of-Canopy Reflectances:
maximum: 326.271 # This is Temperature in K
maximum: 172.05
maximum: 117.96
maximum: 775.934
maximum: 1.66005
maximum: 120.506
maximum: 477.744
Is my understanding correct?
Is there a safe criterion to filter high reflectance values? Could they be
attributed to other sources, e.g. fires?
Can I use some different color rules/scheme which will "ignore" too high
reflectances? Simply "color=grey1.0" or other based on stddev, quantiles?
Thank you in advance for your invaluable time,
Nikos