Thx to the help of Emiliano Giovanni Vavassori the GRASS Flyer is nearly finished.
Thx to Carlos
I put two prototypes online where only one figure is different (one showing some image processing capabilites and one showing 3d modelling).
They can be found here
http://www.geog.fu-berlin.de/~malte/flyer_v03_1.pdf
http://www.geog.fu-berlin.de/~malte/flyer_v03_2.pdf
Just let me know which you'll like better so I know which one the GRASS community prefer.
Waiting for your opinions
Malte
Il giorno Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 07:51:22PM +0100, Malte Halbey-Martin ha scritto:
Just let me know which you'll like better so I know which one the GRASS
community prefer.
I prefer the second one.
I also make a little proposal: changing "R" to "GNU R", if it's not a
problem of space.
Cheers.
--
Emiliano Giovanni Vavassori - http://syntaxerrormmm.altervista.org/
GuIT --- Home page: http://www.guit.sssup.it/
Please, no Word or PowerPoint attachments. Do so only if it's
extremely necessary.
Emiliano Giovanni Vavassori wrote:
I also make a little proposal: changing "R" to "GNU R", if it's not a
problem of space.
Why? It is not often called that, not even on its own website or in
official docs. In my opinion, naming should follow the conventions
used by the creators/maintainers (provided they're consistent - if not,
then the most often used one).
PB
--
Geographical Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Earth Sciences, UMCS
http://gis.umcs.lublin.pl/en/
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, [ISO-8859-2] Przemys³aw Bojczuk wrote:
Emiliano Giovanni Vavassori wrote:
> I also make a little proposal: changing "R" to "GNU R", if it's not a
> problem of space.Why? It is not often called that, not even on its own website or in
official docs. In my opinion, naming should follow the conventions
used by the creators/maintainers (provided they're consistent - if not,
then the most often used one).
I completely agree, there is no reason whatsoever to use the wrong name. R
is available under the terms of GPL, but there are no links to GNU as
such, and R is (oddly perhaps) not listed on
http://directory.fsf.org/math/stats/
nor anywhere else on
Roger
PB
--
Roger Bivand
Economic Geography Section, Department of Economics, Norwegian School of
Economics and Business Administration, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen,
Norway. voice: +47 55 95 93 55; fax +47 55 95 95 43
e-mail: Roger.Bivand@nhh.no
Il giorno Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:11:14AM +0100, Przemysław Bojczuk ha scritto:
Why? It is not often called that, not even on its own website or in
official docs. In my opinion, naming should follow the conventions
used by the creators/maintainers (provided they're consistent - if not,
then the most often used one).
You are right, sorry for posting of such an idiot question. I didn't
check the official site and (also) I remembered wrong. I agree with your position, now.
Sorry again,
--
Emiliano Giovanni Vavassori - http://syntaxerrormmm.altervista.org/
GuIT --- Home page: http://www.guit.sssup.it/
Please, no Word or PowerPoint attachments. Do so only if it's
extremely necessary.
Malte,
I think both are very nice. I slightly prefer 3.1 over 3.2. 3.2 has an image
generated with ParaView, implying that it is needed to display such complex
4D data. In fact, NVIZ can produce exactly the same display. It is good to
note that GRASS can export to many other programs, including ParaView. But
since this is a GRASS PR document, I'd prefer to show what GRASS can do.
Michael
On 3/18/07 11:51 AM, "Malte Halbey-Martin" <malte@perlomat.de> wrote:
Thx to the help of Emiliano Giovanni Vavassori the GRASS Flyer is nearly
finished.
Thx to CarlosI put two prototypes online where only one figure is different (one
showing some image processing capabilites and one showing 3d modelling).They can be found here
http://www.geog.fu-berlin.de/~malte/flyer_v03_1.pdf
http://www.geog.fu-berlin.de/~malte/flyer_v03_2.pdf
Just let me know which you'll like better so I know which one the GRASS
community prefer.Waiting for your opinions
Malte
__________________________________________
Michael Barton, Professor of Anthropology
School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
Arizona State University
phone: 480-965-6213
fax: 480-965-7671
www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton
Hi all
Looking at the flyer I think saying GRASS supports PostGIS can be a
bit confusing in the sense that someone could think that GRASS can
manipulate PostGIS data directly, which it is not the case (if I am
not wrong).
Thanks for the work 
Jorge
2007/3/18, Malte Halbey-Martin <malte@perlomat.de>:
Thx to the help of Emiliano Giovanni Vavassori the GRASS Flyer is nearly
finished.
Thx to CarlosI put two prototypes online where only one figure is different (one
showing some image processing capabilites and one showing 3d modelling).They can be found here
http://www.geog.fu-berlin.de/~malte/flyer_v03_1.pdf
http://www.geog.fu-berlin.de/~malte/flyer_v03_2.pdf
Just let me know which you'll like better so I know which one the GRASS
community prefer.Waiting for your opinions
Malte_______________________________________________
grassuser mailing list
grassuser@grass.itc.it
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grassuser
I put two prototypes online where only one figure is different (one
showing some image processing capabilites and one showing 3d modelling).They can be found here
http://www.geog.fu-berlin.de/~malte/flyer_v03_1.pdf
http://www.geog.fu-berlin.de/~malte/flyer_v03_2.pdf
Just let me know which you'll like better so I know which one the GRASS
community prefer.Waiting for your opinions
Malte_______________________________________________
grassuser mailing list
grassuser@grass.itc.it
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grassuser
Very Nice! Very professional and clean.
I think I slightly prefer the 3D modelling over the Image processing.
Makes GRASS appear more sophisticated.
Most GIS colleagues that I know seem to have a good knowledge about GRASS's image processing capabilities,
however, most people don't even realize that GRASS has vector capabilities now.
(some forestry program professors even teach that GRASS is a powerful Raster GIS app but has no Vector capabilities)
There was an argument that the image is from a separate application, that the same image could be produced in NVIZ...
perhaps this is a suitable argument, I don't know...
All in all, fantastic work!
I like the design layout, top drawer.
cheers!
Mars