[GRASS-user] Looking for Development Help

GRASS GRASS user
1

   I've communicated with Francois Delclaux, the author (in 2000) of r.fuzzy.
He has no time to contribute to updating, perhaps expanding, the tools to
work with 6.4.

   Because of my expertise with approximate reasoning models using fuzzy sets and logic
I can see a lot of business potential by being able to incorporate linguisic
variables and rule-based logic into spatial analyses.

   I'm looking for help in this effort. Please contact me off the list if
you'll work with me.

Thanks,

Rich

2

Rich wrote:

I've communicated with
Francois Delclaux, the author (in 2000) of r.fuzzy.
He has no time to contribute to updating, perhaps
expanding, the tools to work with 6.4.

fwiw any raster module written for grass 6.0 will probably work
with 6.4 without any additional effort. And any purely raster
module from 5.0 will probably work too (as long as it doesn't
try to do things with vectors or points).

if it doesn't work directly out of the box, it will need minor
tweaks at the worst.

Hamish

3

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Hamish <hamish_b@yahoo.com> wrote:

Rich wrote:

I've communicated with
Francois Delclaux, the author (in 2000) of r.fuzzy.
He has no time to contribute to updating, perhaps
expanding, the tools to work with 6.4.

fwiw any raster module written for grass 6.0 will probably work
with 6.4 without any additional effort. And any purely raster
module from 5.0 will probably work too (as long as it doesn't
try to do things with vectors or points).

if it doesn't work directly out of the box, it will need minor
tweaks at the worst.

Another note: it would be best to continue development in the
Addons-SVN (that also increases the chance to get above updates
easier).

Markus

4

On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Hamish wrote:

fwiw any raster module written for grass 6.0 will probably work with 6.4
without any additional effort. And any purely raster module from 5.0 will
probably work too (as long as it doesn't try to do things with vectors or
points).

Hamish,

   That's great news! What I don't see, yet, is the inference engine or just
how it's supposed to be implemented. I'll look at the code more closely this
weekend.

Thanks,

Rich