[GRASS-user] r.watershed SFD with depression bug?

GRASS GRASS user
1

Hi list,
just wanted to verify if anyone else has noticed that running r.watershed in -s mode WITH depressions gets stuck in the watershed determination (section 4). I have tested this with grass7beta under suse linux, with and without the -m and -b flags.
Thanks,
Michel

2

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Michel Wortmann
<wortmann@pik-potsdam.de> wrote:

Hi list,
just wanted to verify if anyone else has noticed that running r.watershed in
-s mode WITH depressions gets stuck in the watershed determination (section
4). I have tested this with grass7beta under suse linux, with and without
the -m and -b flags.

Can you reproduce this with one of the GRASS sample datasets or
provide test data to reproduce?

Thanks,

Markus M

3

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Markus Metz
<markus.metz.giswork@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Michel Wortmann
<wortmann@pik-potsdam.de> wrote:

Hi list,
just wanted to verify if anyone else has noticed that running r.watershed in
-s mode WITH depressions gets stuck in the watershed determination (section
4). I have tested this with grass7beta under suse linux, with and without
the -m and -b flags.

Can you reproduce this with one of the GRASS sample datasets or
provide test data to reproduce?

I found a potential bug related to your problem, fixed in trunk r59898
and relbr70 r59899.

Markus M