[GRASS-user] Re: grassuser Digest, Vol 9, Issue 33

GRASS GRASS user
,
1

Bill,

I'd go ahead and use the 6.3 cvs version if I were you. It's got a number of
improvements over 6.2 and is very stable.

I wonder if 6.2 (several months old) is not compatible with the latest GDAL?

Michael

On 1/24/07 11:25 AM, "grassuser-request@grass.itc.it"
<grassuser-request@grass.itc.it> wrote:

Send grassuser mailing list submissions to
grassuser@grass.itc.it

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grassuser
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
grassuser-request@grass.itc.it

You can reach the person managing the list at
grassuser-owner@grass.itc.it

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of grassuser digest..."
Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Error configuring grass-gdal 1.3.2: grass libs not found
      (Glynn Clements)
   2. RE: Error configuring grass-gdal 1.3.2: grass libs not found
      (Patton, Eric)
   3. gdal_version.h for gdal-1.2.5-1.i586.rpm (Lawrence Houston)
   4. Re: gdal_version.h for gdal-1.2.5-1.i586.rpm (Otto Dassau)
   5. Re: Error configuring grass-gdal 1.3.2: grass libs not found
      (Jaros?aw Jasiewicz)
   6. RE: Error configuring grass-gdal 1.3.2: grass libs not found
      (Patton, Eric)
   7. Kyngesburye GRASS 6.2.1-2 Mac OS X Binary: Framework trouble
      (William A. Perkins)
   8. Re: Kyngesburye GRASS 6.2.1-2 Mac OS X Binary: Framework
      trouble (William A. Perkins)
_______________________________________________
grassuser mailing list
grassuser@grass.itc.it
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grassuser

__________________________________________
Michael Barton, Professor of Anthropology
School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
Arizona State University

phone: 480-965-6213
fax: 480-965-7671
www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton

2

Michael Barton napisał(a):

Bill,

I'd go ahead and use the 6.3 cvs version if I were you. It's got a number of
improvements over 6.2 and is very stable.

I wonder if 6.2 (several months old) is not compatible with the latest GDAL?

I have installed both 6.2.1 and latest 6.3 on "fresh" gdal 1.4 gdal was compiled with grass.6.2.1 libraries
I found no erros in import/export in most popular formats (except problems with corrupted file)
I can say nothing about older grass 6.2.0

Jarek