[GRASS5] [bug #3143] (grass) G3.REGION DOES NOT EXIST

GRASS GIS GRASS GIS developer
1

this bug's URL: http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=3143
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: G3.REGION DOES NOT EXIST

Platform: WindowsNT/2000/XP
grass obtained from: Trento Italy site
grass binary for platform: Downloaded precompiled Binaries

José Antonio Ferrari

When I try to use G3.SETREGION, I see this message: no such file or directory

What is wrong ?

Thank you

-------------------------------------------- Managed by Request Tracker

2

On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:31:18PM +0200, Request Tracker wrote:

this bug's URL: http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=3143
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: G3.REGION DOES NOT EXIST

Platform: WindowsNT/2000/XP
grass obtained from: Trento Italy site
grass binary for platform: Downloaded precompiled Binaries

José Antonio Ferrari

When I try to use G3.SETREGION, I see this message: no such file or directory

What is wrong ?

Nothing as GRASS has evolved:

   * g3.createwind - no longer needed
   * g3.list - integrated in g.list
   * g3.region - integrated in g.region
   * g3.remove - integrated in g.remove
   * g3.rename - integrated in g.rename
   * g3.setregion - integrated in g.region

I have update the GRASS ModulePortingList at
http://grass.gdf-hannover.de/twiki/bin/view/GRASS/ModulePortingList

Cheers

Markus

3

Markus

BTW that you mention
http://grass.gdf-hannover.de/twiki/bin/view/GRASS/ModulePortingList I can
see there is no i.tm.dehaze mentioned while it is missing in the Grass
6.0/6.1. Is there a particular reason for this module is rejected?

Although I'm asking this, after I tried it in 5.4 I couldn't say it was
improving my TM scene. Rather the opposite - got darken and kindoff blury
instead. But according to "Readme" it seems to potentionaly provide a
valuable, interesting functionality. Thus could it be it is broken in 5.4 so
needs a fix and could be included into 6.1 then? Or maybe I didn't use it
properly so we may suppose that a better description would do?

Maciek

----- Original Message ----- From: "Markus Neteler" <neteler@itc.it>
To: "Request Tracker" <grass-bugs@intevation.de>
Cc: <grass5@grass.itc.it>
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: [GRASS5] [bug #3143] (grass) G3.REGION DOES NOT EXIST

On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:31:18PM +0200, Request Tracker wrote:

this bug's URL: http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=3143
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: G3.REGION DOES NOT EXIST

Platform: WindowsNT/2000/XP
grass obtained from: Trento Italy site
grass binary for platform: Downloaded precompiled Binaries

José Antonio Ferrari

When I try to use G3.SETREGION, I see this message: no such file or
directory

What is wrong ?

Nothing as GRASS has evolved:

  * g3.createwind - no longer needed
  * g3.list - integrated in g.list
  * g3.region - integrated in g.region
  * g3.remove - integrated in g.remove
  * g3.rename - integrated in g.rename
  * g3.setregion - integrated in g.region

I have update the GRASS ModulePortingList at
http://grass.gdf-hannover.de/twiki/bin/view/GRASS/ModulePortingList

Cheers

Markus

_______________________________________________
grass5 mailing list
grass5@grass.itc.it
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass5

4

On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 10:40:48PM +0200, Maciek Sieczka wrote:

Markus

BTW that you mention
http://grass.gdf-hannover.de/twiki/bin/view/GRASS/ModulePortingList I can
see there is no i.tm.dehaze mentioned while it is missing in the Grass
6.0/6.1. Is there a particular reason for this module is rejected?

No. Probably also others are missing. It's a WIKI, everybody
can contribute.
If you like, please port i.tm.dehaze to GRASS 6.

Although I'm asking this, after I tried it in 5.4 I couldn't say it was
improving my TM scene. Rather the opposite - got darken and kindoff blury
instead. But according to "Readme" it seems to potentionaly provide a
valuable, interesting functionality. Thus could it be it is broken in 5.4 so

It's unlikely that it is broken in 5.4.

needs a fix and could be included into 6.1 then? Or maybe I didn't use it
properly so we may suppose that a better description would do?

That might be possible.

Markus

5

On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 23:09 +0200, Markus Neteler wrote:

On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 10:40:48PM +0200, Maciek Sieczka wrote:
> Markus
>
> BTW that you mention
> http://grass.gdf-hannover.de/twiki/bin/view/GRASS/ModulePortingList I can
> see there is no i.tm.dehaze mentioned while it is missing in the Grass
> 6.0/6.1. Is there a particular reason for this module is rejected?

No. Probably also others are missing. It's a WIKI, everybody
can contribute.
If you like, please port i.tm.dehaze to GRASS 6.

This is one of the modules on my to-do list. It is not very high on the
priority list, though.

--
Brad Douglas <rez@touchofmadness.com>