this bug's URL: http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=3973
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: ./configure: FORTRAN compiler not set
Platform: GNU/Linux/i386
grass obtained from: CVS
grass binary for platform: Compiled from Sources
GRASS Version: cvs 2005.01.10
Although I have g77 and f77 present in my system...
$ f77 --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 3.4.5 20050809 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 3.4.4-6ubuntu8)
Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
$ g77 --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 3.4.5 20050809 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 3.4.4-6ubuntu8)
Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
...the FORTRAN compiler is not set at ./configure:
GRASS is now configured for: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Source directory: /home/john/src/straight/grass6
Build directory: /home/john/src/straight/grass6
Installation directory: /usr/local/grass-6.1.cvs
Startup script in directory: ${exec_prefix}/bin
C compiler: gcc -g -O2
C++ compiler: c++ -g -O2
FORTRAN compiler: <- SHOULDN'T IT BE g77 OR STH?
Building shared libraries: yes
64bit support: no
NVIZ: yes
X11 support: yes
JPEG support: yes
TIFF support: yes
PNG support: yes
Tcl/Tk support: yes
PostgreSQL support: yes
MySQL support: no
SQLite support: yes
FFMPEG support: no
OpenGL(R) support: yes
ODBC support: no
FFTW support: yes
BLAS support: no
LAPACK support: no
Motif support: no
FreeType support: yes
GLw support: no
NLS support: no
Readline support: no
C++ support: yes
openDWG support: no
GDAL support: yes
OGR support: yes
Large File Support (LFS): yes
Maciek
-------------------------------------------- Managed by Request Tracker
Request Tracker wrote:
this bug's URL: http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=3973
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: ./configure: FORTRAN compiler not set
The check was disabled in configure.in:
revision 1.65
date: 2004/11/29 09:17:58; author: markus; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
disabled F77 as not needed
lib/cdhc still has some Fortran files, but they aren't used.
--
Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 04:56:59PM +0000, Glynn Clements wrote:
Request Tracker wrote:
> this bug's URL: http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=3973
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: ./configure: FORTRAN compiler not set
The check was disabled in configure.in:
revision 1.65
date: 2004/11/29 09:17:58; author: markus; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
disabled F77 as not needed
See
http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=2731
You suggested to (probably) remove it:
Glynn Clements glynn at gclements.plus.com
Sun, 28 Nov 2004 05:18:33 +0000
"The configure check should probably be removed."
http://grass.itc.it/pipermail/grass5/2004-November/016200.html
lib/cdhc still has some Fortran files, but they aren't used.
So, do we want it back? Doesn't it confuse people who do not have
Fortran installed (such as the ongoing BLAS/LAPACK confusion)?
Markus
Markus Neteler wrote:
> > this bug's URL: http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=3973
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Subject: ./configure: FORTRAN compiler not set
>
> The check was disabled in configure.in:
>
> revision 1.65
> date: 2004/11/29 09:17:58; author: markus; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
> disabled F77 as not needed
See
http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=2731
You suggested to (probably) remove it:
Glynn Clements glynn at gclements.plus.com
Sun, 28 Nov 2004 05:18:33 +0000
"The configure check should probably be removed."
http://grass.itc.it/pipermail/grass5/2004-November/016200.html
> lib/cdhc still has some Fortran files, but they aren't used.
So, do we want it back? Doesn't it confuse people who do not have
Fortran installed (such as the ongoing BLAS/LAPACK confusion)?
At a minimum, while the f77/g77 check in configure.in is disabled, the
"FORTRAN compiler" message should also be disabled.
Also, if the Fortran files in lib/cdhc are no longer necessary, they
should probably be removed.
--
Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:23:07PM +0000, Glynn Clements wrote:
Markus Neteler wrote:
> > > this bug's URL: http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=3973
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Subject: ./configure: FORTRAN compiler not set
> >
> > The check was disabled in configure.in:
> >
> > revision 1.65
> > date: 2004/11/29 09:17:58; author: markus; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
> > disabled F77 as not needed
>
> See
> http://intevation.de/rt/webrt?serial_num=2731
>
> You suggested to (probably) remove it:
>
> Glynn Clements glynn at gclements.plus.com
> Sun, 28 Nov 2004 05:18:33 +0000
> "The configure check should probably be removed."
> http://grass.itc.it/pipermail/grass5/2004-November/016200.html
>
> > lib/cdhc still has some Fortran files, but they aren't used.
>
> So, do we want it back? Doesn't it confuse people who do not have
> Fortran installed (such as the ongoing BLAS/LAPACK confusion)?
At a minimum, while the f77/g77 check in configure.in is disabled, the
"FORTRAN compiler" message should also be disabled.
Also, if the Fortran files in lib/cdhc are no longer necessary, they
should probably be removed.
--
Glynn Clements <glynn@gclements.plus.com>
Someone may to submit necessary changes.
Markus