Markus wrote:
Please login (see at bottom in RT),
then you can close within the bug report (there is a resolve button).
I assume that I'll log in with my CVS user name, but what is one
supposed to use as a password?
Roger Miller
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 11:57:06AM -0700, rgrmill@rt66.com wrote:
Markus wrote:
> Please login (see at bottom in RT),
> then you can close within the bug report (there is a resolve button).I assume that I'll log in with my CVS user name, but what is one
supposed to use as a password?
That's an issue for Bernhard, I think.
Markus
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 07:59:11PM +0200, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 11:57:06AM -0700, rgrmill@rt66.com wrote:
> > Please login (see at bottom in RT),
> > then you can close within the bug report (there is a resolve button).
>
> I assume that I'll log in with my CVS user name, but what is one
> supposed to use as a password?
CVS logins and RT logins are separated.
That's an issue for Bernhard, I think.
Yes. I forgot to give Roger a RT login.
Now he has one.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 01:13:10PM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Yes. I forgot to give Roger a RT login.
Now he has one.
I would have had one by now,
if the E-Mail I've send him went through.
Right now I cannot send E-Mail to Roger at rgrmill@rt66.com
using the normal way.
They probably had a wrong DNS entry and this has to propagate to us.
$ host -t MX rt66.com
rt66.com mail is handled (pri=1) by 208.254.80.2.rt66.com
$ ping 208.254.80.2.rt66.com
ping: unknown host 208.254.80.2.rt66.com
The new one probably is pop.rt66.com.
Bernhard
--
Professional Service for Free Software (intevation.net)
The FreeGIS Project (freegis.org)
Association for a Free Informational Infrastructure (ffii.org)
FSF Europe (fsfeurope.org)
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 01:40:25PM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 01:13:10PM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> Yes. I forgot to give Roger a RT login.
> Now he has one.I would have had one by now,
if the E-Mail I've send him went through.Right now I cannot send E-Mail to Roger at rgrmill@rt66.com
using the normal way.
They probably had a wrong DNS entry and this has to propagate to us.$ host -t MX rt66.com
rt66.com mail is handled (pri=1) by 208.254.80.2.rt66.com
I get
host -t MX rt66.com
rt66.com. mail is handled by 20 chili.rt66.com.
rt66.com. mail is handled by 10 pop.rt66.com.
$ ping 208.254.80.2.rt66.com
ping: unknown host 208.254.80.2.rt66.com
ping pop.rt66.com
PING ns2.rt66.com (208.254.80.2) from 10.40.0.110 : 56(84) bytes of data.
26 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
ping chili.rt66.com
PING chili.rt66.com (208.254.80.51) from 10.40.0.110 : 56(84) bytes of data.
9 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
Mhhh,
Markus
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 01:51:00PM +0200, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 01:40:25PM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 01:13:10PM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> They probably had a wrong DNS entry and this has to propagate to us.
ping pop.rt66.com
26 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
It might work for you, because you already have the right dns entries.
Doesn't change the situation here, though
unless I write my own dns entry or use a differnt server to check.
Anyway, not a grass related probem, but normal dns.