Since d.out.file supports PNG and more, isn't d.out.png redundant now?
Maciek
--------------------
W polskim Internecie s? setki milion?w stron. My przekazujemy Tobie tylko najlepsze z nich!
http://katalog.panoramainternetu.pl/
Since d.out.file supports PNG and more, isn't d.out.png redundant now?
Maciek
--------------------
W polskim Internecie s? setki milion?w stron. My przekazujemy Tobie tylko najlepsze z nich!
http://katalog.panoramainternetu.pl/
Both are replaced in the new gis manager.
Michael
______________________________
Michael Barton, Professor of Anthropology
School of Human Evolution and Social Change
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ 85287-2402
USA
voice: 480-965-6262; fax: 480-965-7671
www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton
From: Maciek Sieczka <werchowyna@epf.pl>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:48:59 +0100
To: <grass5@grass.itc.it>
Subject: [GRASS5] d.out.file/d.out.pngSince d.out.file supports PNG and more, isn't d.out.png redundant now?
Maciek
--------------------
W polskim Internecie s? setki milion?w stron. My przekazujemy Tobie tylko
najlepsze z nich!
http://katalog.panoramainternetu.pl/
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:33:43 -0700
Michael Barton <michael.barton@asu.edu> wrote:
> From: Maciek Sieczka <werchowyna@epf.pl>
> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:48:59 +0100
> Since d.out.file supports PNG and more, isn't d.out.png redundant
> now?
Both are replaced in the new gis manager.
Nice, but I guess this doesn't answer my question (?).
I'm asking if we still need d.out.png in Grass given the presence of
more universal d.out.file.
Maciek
--------------------
W polskim Internecie s? setki milion?w stron. My przekazujemy Tobie tylko najlepsze z nich!
http://katalog.panoramainternetu.pl/