Don't know how much it matters, but a couple months back I had to
move my web data to a slightly different domain, so old links
to any grass pages I maintain won't resolve. Simply substitute
"pweb" for "www" in the address, and everything should be fine.
I don't know how much an issue the LZW thing is anymore, but I
intend to keep it up for a while longer (at least until
late spring/early summer).
I'll probably be taking down most of the pages that were created
via the command XML output, since they are consuming a fair
amount of space (and they're outdated anyway). My thought was
to leave a couple samples of output, and the XSL style sheets
used to create them...
I'll probably be removing the developers map as well. It never
was complete. I still have the data on Lat/Lon's for people who
sent the info to me. Perhaps, someone wants a copy?
--
Eric G. Miller <egm2@jps.net>
On Tue 27. November 2001 04:24, Eric G. Miller wrote:
I'll probably be removing the developers map as well. It never
was complete. I still have the data on Lat/Lon's for people who
sent the info to me. Perhaps, someone wants a copy?
Could you commit developers locations in sites format to CVS repository?
(grass/documets/devel_sites or similar).
Otherwise please send the copy to me.
Radim
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:47:47 +0100
Radim Blazek <radim.blazek@dhv.cz> wrote:
On Tue 27. November 2001 04:24, Eric G. Miller wrote:
>
> I'll probably be removing the developers map as well. It never
> was complete. I still have the data on Lat/Lon's for people who
> sent the info to me. Perhaps, someone wants a copy?
Could you commit developers locations in sites format to CVS repository?
(grass/documets/devel_sites or similar).
Otherwise please send the copy to me.
Have whole location for it, with a nice color raster set of the earth.
Would grass/documents/ be an appropriate location? The new improved
d.rgb does a nicer job with the raster now... The whole location
is about 11 MB, but I can drop off alot of that by deleting the
imported raster cell files. The source raster is a jpeg
encoded TIFF of about 1MB, but as 3 band files in native GRASS
format it expands to close to 10MB. The TIFF is easy enough to
reimport...
--
Eric G. Miller <egm2@jps.net>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 07:24:28PM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
I don't know how much an issue the LZW thing is anymore, but I
intend to keep it up for a while longer (at least until
late spring/early summer).
Please keep it forever, if possible.
(URLs should never die and contents should not be lost.)
I think it is important for history reasons.
We should save the files somewhere and put it up on the grass
webpages.
--
Professional Service around Free Software (intevation.net)
The FreeGIS Project (freegis.org)
Association for a Free Informational Infrastructure (ffii.org)
FSF Europe (fsfeurope.org)
On Tue 27. November 2001 09:25, Eric G. Miller wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:47:47 +0100
Radim Blazek <radim.blazek@dhv.cz> wrote:
> On Tue 27. November 2001 04:24, Eric G. Miller wrote:
> > I'll probably be removing the developers map as well. It never
> > was complete. I still have the data on Lat/Lon's for people who
> > sent the info to me. Perhaps, someone wants a copy?
>
> Could you commit developers locations in sites format to CVS repository?
> (grass/documets/devel_sites or similar).
>
> Otherwise please send the copy to me.
Have whole location for it, with a nice color raster set of the earth.
Would grass/documents/ be an appropriate location? The new improved
d.rgb does a nicer job with the raster now... The whole location
is about 11 MB, but I can drop off alot of that by deleting the
imported raster cell files. The source raster is a jpeg
encoded TIFF of about 1MB, but as 3 band files in native GRASS
format it expands to close to 10MB. The TIFF is easy enough to
reimport...
My idea was to enable site file updates for developers.
Please send me the whole location (including grass rasters) and
either commit site file only to repository or I'll do that later.
Radim