On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 08:37:57PM +0200, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 12:56:07PM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...]
> I wrote that a few mails ago and it was meant against "deleting 5.0"
> from the servers. (That was a missunderstanding that got clarified,
> nobody proposed to delete it.)[also related to your latest message, Bernhard]
Just to clarify that again: Radim and me have spent much time to
find (!) all the versions. We still try to get hands on the
CERL-4.2 which was never published. Jim Westervelt is trying to
find it for me (us). So, just by entering the
web site through ftp you can see all the versions in subdirectories.
Yes, you did not delete them as I wrote above.
(clarified the third time now.)
Perhaps you didn't see this page?
http://grass.itc.it/grass_releases.html
Not sure what else could be done.
You can click on all versions and grab the source code.
I did see that page and in comparision to the table
that was there before it basically got "hidden".
What can you do:
Make a direct link to the ftp directory (ftp://grass.itc.it/pub/grass/)
which has all the versions, or better:
Have page only listing the old source tarballs in a table
clearly marking them as source tarballs.
Even better would to to improve the structure to have an
directory only containing all the sources, e.g. much like:
ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/
If you want to see detailed changes (diffs), go here:
http://mpa.itc.it/radim/g50history/Radim has spent much time to make it convenient HTML pages.
He even fetched all related emails:
http://mpa.itc.it/radim/g50history/grass50history.html
Yes, very important work.
However, to offer many different development lines is impossible
unless more developers join the team. But this has been discussed
often enough.
And I tend to disagree because keeping them available and clearly marking
their status is a matter of marking and keeping the revisions,
not of more effort. Then each person can choose what version to try.
And old one or a different one.
Of course I agree that we need more contributors
and until they come, it might well be that a stable version
is only stable in their bugs.
Bernhard