Folks,
I have introduced the option of linking r.in.gdal directly against GDAL instead
of using the run time loading mechanism. This is primarily intended to allow
building r.in.gdal on platforms without shared libraries and dlopen().
I just checked into the default CVS branch, I am not quite sure where things
are supposed to go now. Let me know if anyone encounters problems or
whats to test out the new build option.
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam@pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 05:52:45PM -0400, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Folks,
I have introduced the option of linking r.in.gdal directly against GDAL
instead
of using the run time loading mechanism. This is primarily intended to
allow
building r.in.gdal on platforms without shared libraries and dlopen().
I just checked into the default CVS branch, I am not quite sure where things
are supposed to go now. Let me know if anyone encounters problems or
whats to test out the new build option.
Frank,
please re-check everything again into the release branch.
At time you are working on the very outdated
experimental tree.
To upgrade your local CVS copy, run:
cvs update -r releasebranch_11_april_2001_5_0_0
cvs up -dP # this one might not be necessary, but we want to be sure
Then check in your improvements again.
Thanks in advance,
Markus